Social Contract & Mature Language Filter

Way to miss the point. The point was the system is broken and doesn’t function, because it is applying a theory from criminal psychology and doing it poorly. This is an alternative system that would work as intended and apply deterrence theory correctly.

I wasn’t condoning hate speech, I was establishing that you manually agree to physically see words of a mature nature, and that you can’t be upset when seeing the words because you chose to see them. All the words you mentioned would appear are gibberish had you left the feature enabled, and then all that profanity, and hate speech you don’t want to see would’t be readable to you. However, it’s blatantly clear this feature is not addressing the issue adequately, hence the need for reform. Hope that clear things up for you.

12 Likes

It’s not new, as in, new rules. So keep that in mind.

These are the same rules we’ve had in the EULA and CoCs for ages.

Because mature language is swear words, not hate speech. There’s a huge difference.

Moritz’s comment said it best.

And props to Vulpes for finding the Blizz quote! :two_hearts:

12 Likes

It’s context. If you say [dolphin noise] just by itself it isn’t bad. But if it’s like “You’re a [dolphin noise] and bad.” Then that would cause massive red flags.

We all agreed to a code of conduct when we joined the game. In that agreement it was stated that we are not allowed to say or do certain things. And if we disagree don’t play the game.

I personally don’t understand why shifting the responsibility away from the person who can control what they type is the answer to the problem.

2 Likes

Mature Language Filter (aka The Profanity Filter)

This can be activated within your Interface Options: Main menu (ESC key by default) Click Interface > Social and check - Mature Language Filter.

Once enabled, all inappropriate words in our profanity database will be filtered and masked to appear as jumbled characters, such as ‘*##@&’.

Note: The filter does not excuse the language used. The filter serves as a temporary shield, to help parents of minors and others who do not wish to see it, to block it. Our policies prohibit the use of both clear and masked inappropriate language.

The existance of the filter does not mean people can break the rules, it is for those who still don’t want to see it.

Having a filter automated to give vacations though seems like it would hit too many innocent in addition to guilty.

At this point human decisions are still best for any real punishment like a suspension.

Absolutely incorrect. All of it is still punishable. Has been since 2004.


Someone asked about this this earlier today so I looked it all up. Original documents that we agreed to in 2004.

Original User Manual from 2004 https://bnetcmsus-a.akamaihd.net/cms/template_resource/LO0VQ46XB1281555957773363.pdf - which has the EULA at the end. It points to the requirements for accepting Terms of Use with the website for it. I selected the first archived Wayback Machine TOU for WoW from 2004. I have copied out the relevant sections for you. Yes, it included hateful names and speech.

https://web.archive.org/web/20041217101250/http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/legal/termsofuse.shtml

  1. World of Warcraft Rules of Conduct.

As with all things, World of Warcraft is governed by certain rules of conduct that must be adhered to by all users of World of Warcraft. It is your responsibility to know, understand and abide by these rules of conduct. The following rules are not meant to be “exhaustive,” and Blizzard Entertainment reserves the right to determine what conduct it considers to be outside the spirit of the game and to take such disciplinary measures as it sees fit. Blizzard Entertainment reserves the right to add to or amend this list of rules at any time, and you are responsible for checking these Terms of Use for any newly amended or posted rules each time that you log on.

A. Rules Related to User Names.

Each user will select a user name for his or her character, or allow the World of Warcraft software to select the name for him or her. Additionally, users may form “guilds” and such guilds will be required to choose a name for the guild. When you choose a user name, create a guild, or otherwise create a label that can be seen by other players of World of Warcraft, you must abide by the following guidelines as well as the rules of common decency. If Blizzard Entertainment, in its sole discretion, finds such a label to be offensive, it reserves the right to change the name, remove the label and corresponding chat room, and/or suspend your use of World of Warcraft.

In particular, you may not use:

  1. Names of another person with the intent to impersonate that person;

  2. Names which incorporate ‘swear’ words or which are otherwise offensive, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

  3. Names subject to the rights of any other person without authorization;

  4. Names of popular culture or media personalities;

  5. Names that are trademarks, or registered trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment or other companies);

  6. Names of religious deities or figures;

  7. Names of characters from Blizzard Entertainment’s Warcraft products, including character names from the Warcraft series of novels; or

  8. Names related to drugs, narcotics, or criminal activity, including references to drug substances; or

  9. Name comprised of partial or complete sentences (e.g., “Inyourface”, “Welovebeef”, etc);

  10. Names comprised of pure gibberish (eg, “Asdfasdf”, “Jjxccm”, “Hvlldrm”);

  11. Names that refer to pop culture icons or personas (e.g. “Britneyspears”, “Austinpowers”, “Batman”)

  12. Names that utilize “Leet” or “Dudespeak” (e.g., “Roflcopter”, “xxnewbxx”, “Roxxoryou”)

  13. Name that incorporate titles. The term “Titles” as used herein shall include ‘rank’ titles (e.g. , “CorporalTed,” or “GeneralVlad”) and/or fantasy titles (e.g., “KingMike”, “LordSanchez”)

Additionally, you may not use a misspelling or an alternative spelling to circumvent the name restrictions listed above, nor can you have a “first” and “last” name that, when combined, violate the above name restrictions.

B. Rules Related to “Chat” and Interaction With Other Users.

Communicating with other Users and Blizzard Entertainment representatives is an integral part of World of Warcraft and is referred to in this document as “Chat.” Your Chats may be subject to review, modification, and deletion without notice by Blizzard Entertainment. Additionally, you hereby acknowledge that Blizzard Entertainment is under no obligation to monitor Chat and you engage in Chat at your own risk. When engaging in Chat in World of Warcraft, or otherwise utilizing World of Warcraft, you may not:

  • (i) Transmit or post sexually explicit images or other content or language which in the sole discretion of Blizzard Entertainment is deemed to be offensive; nor shall you transmit any unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable content or language, nor may you use a misspelling or an alternative spelling to circumvent the content and language restrictions listed above;

  • (ii) Carry out any action with a disruptive effect, such as cause the Chat screen to “scroll” faster than other users are able to type to it, including setting up macros with large amounts of text that, when used, can have a disruptive effect on the normal flow of Chat;

  • (iii) Disrupt the normal flow of dialogue in Chat or otherwise act in a manner that negatively affects other users, individuals or entities, including, but not limited to, posting “Spam” messages on World of Warcraft (“Spam” messages as used in this document include, but are not limited to, any effort to use a computer or other electronic device to post an unauthorized and/or unsolicited advertisement to World of Warcraft);

  • (iv) “Spam” by posting or sending more than one unsolicited message or piece of mail to a single address or in a chat area;

  • (v) Communicate or post any user’s personal information in or on the World of Warcraft, or websites or forums related to World of Warcraft;

  • (vi) Use bots or other automated techniques to collect information or communicate or post any user’s personal information in or on World of Warcraft, or websites or forums related to World of Warcraft or Blizzard Entertainment

  • (vii) Harass, threaten, stalk, embarrass or cause distress, unwanted attention or discomfort to another user of World of Warcraft or other person or entity; or

  • (viii) Cheat during game play, including but not limited to modification of the game program files.

  • (ix) Participate in any action that, in the opinion of Blizzard Entertainment results in an authorized user of World of Warcraft being "scammed " or ‘defrauded’ out of gold, weapons, armor, or any other items that he/she has earned through authorized game play in World of Warcraft.

Now can we please agree that these rules have always been in place for WoW and that updates may refine phrasing, but not core content? If anything the rules are more lax now than that were then.

11 Likes

I’ve seen so many names that literally looked like someone’s cat walked on the keyboard.

wow I haven’t seen leet speak referenced in forever.

But anyway, I’m glad you found that older article that’s pretty cool!

2 Likes

Well, yeah - it was 2004! They have relaxed some of it over time, but the core things are all the same. Updates rephrase, or talk about penalties, but nothing really different.

This is why some players get frustrated seeing people act like being kind and not swearing, not using hateful speech, etc. is something new and trendy in WoW.

4 Likes

The existance of the filter does not mean people can break the rules, it is for those who still don’t want to see it.

Missed the point entirely. I never said it was intended for people to break the rules. What I said was that philosophically, when you make the conscious decision to turn this feature OFF, as it is ON by DEFAULT, you are deciding to see this language. You’re implying you must turn this feature on in order to not see it, which is not how it works by default settings.

Having a filter automated to give vacations though seems like it would hit too many innocent in addition to guilty.

That’s a lazy answer for a lazy person who would rather side step the issue instead of directly deal with the issue. Either it’s not tolerable to say racial slurs or it is. There should be a zero tolerance on racial slurs. There is no setting or scenario where these words are appropriate to use within the game. Auto banning use of racial slurs makes sense.

Also, just because you auto ban for racial slurs doesn’t mean you need to auto ban for casual profanity such as the “F” word, “S” word, or “A” word for example. So again, lazy approach for lazy development.

At this point human decisions are still best for any real punishment like a suspension.

See my last point.

Oh, and we’re just completely disregarding the blatant abuse of this feature in Classic for taking out PvP Ladder competition, and toxic players trolling people they don’t like via mass right click report. Got it.

Absolutely incorrect. All of it is still punishable. Has been since 2004.

Absolutely incorrect. There has never been an official “Social Contract.” there has been a “Terms of Service”, but never an official “Social Contract” as it is being dubbed that you agree to adhere to. I have never is 18 years been “Social Required” to help players I pass by under fear of punishment from Blizzard. Part of the game, more so in Classic, is rivalry. I am not going to help a rival guild, but this social contract says I have to. In fact, for PvE realms, it is severely limiting to Roles I may want to play. I am now forced to role play only a “good guy”. Completely negating anything but a Lawful Good character.

Now can we please agree that these rules have always been in place for WoW and that updates may refine phrasing, but not core content? If anything the rules are more lax now than that were then.

No, the control over a players choice to let another player die, to not help them on a quest, to not help them kill a rare spawn, has never been a rule of the game.

You were so focused on proving me wrong, you side stepped all the issues. You still can’t accept that the current model fails to apply a proven scientific method called Deterrence Theory. So if you want to actually fix the toxic player base, you need to fix the system that doesn’t work. Since this system has been in place for over 18 years, and it still doesn’t work, maybe it’s time to fix the problem instead of trying to band-aid something that doesn’t work. The problem is that the player base cannot adequately police themselves, and your solution is to continue letting them police themselves. It’s literally that simple.

2 Likes

What about the H word or C word against white people?

2 Likes

And you never will be. Go back and read the datamined social contract again. The “be nice” part is suggestions for how to get along in an MMO. Many are already on our tips on the loading screen. Those are not enforceable and you won’t get reported or penalized for not helping or answering a question.

This is the major misunderstanding you seem to have. You seem to think the “be nice” parts are enforceable when they are not.

The enforceable stuff is the bottom of the social contract about language and such, as proven, has been in the game since 2004.

I also remain adamant that an automated ban system for language based on AI is not good. Even optional filters pick up normal words that contain partials and filter those. That is annoying, but it does not remove you from game. I much prefer account suspensions to have human eyes on them.

2 Likes

I also remain adamant that an automated ban system for language based on AI is not good. Even optional filters pick up normal words that contain partials and filter those. That is annoying, but it does not remove you from game. I much prefer account suspensions to have human eyes on them.

Literally millions of discords do this everyday. Completely lazy cop out. What you’re saying is that a multibillion dollar company can’t make a feature that freeware uses on the daily.

This is the major misunderstanding you seem to have. You seem to think the “be nice” parts are enforceable when they are not.

Maybe, but its in a contract now. Maybe they enforce it. Maybe they don’t. Once I click agree though I have to play that way just incase they decide to enforce it. Generally speaking when I see something is a condition of a contract I’m signing I am usually required to adhere to that condition. Oh, by the way, you have another massive hole here. Trade chat is not intended to be used as an in game Google. So this contract creates a contradictory set of rules or suggested gameplay. Filling trade chat with information on various WoW Q&A would constitute spam in the channel. That is of course, unless they offered some sort of trade for the information.

has been in the game since 2004.

You’re really hung up on this one for some reason. Not sure why. Never once said that these words or phrases were allowed. Not sure where you got that from. What I said is that you lose the right to complain about mature words if you turn the filter off. That is not the same as saying it is a free pass for the other person to use them. It’s saying you don’t get to walk into a strip club and be upset there are naked people. You knew what you were going to see when you turned it off. In that moment you said to yourself, yes, these are the things I want to see.

Not related to you, but saw this gem above.

Our game is and has always been Rated T for Teen.

This is only half true. The game itself is rated T for Teen. The online interaction is deemed unrated by the ESRB.

Now can we please agree that these rules have always been in place for WoW and that updates may refine phrasing, but not core content? If anything the rules are more lax now than that were then.

I never said a variation didn’t exist. I am stating that this is indeed, 100%, a new contract with a new name, and new expectations.
It’s like the Ship of Theseus.

the rules are more lax now than that were then.
No. The rules are not more lax. The enforcement of the rules is what has become lax. That’s what happens when you fire your in-game GMs.

SO.
If you think the current system is so great, explain why we are experiencing the worst toxic community we have ever had. Let’s recap.

No in-game GMs. Horrible application of Deterrence Theory. Lazy developers. Community Council that wants to put band-aids on broken non-functional systems.

It’s all here for you plain as day to fix. Now do your job as a “Community Council” member and actually fix the game.

1 Like

Correct. Free Discord means you don’t pay for it. You pay to access WoW and removing paid access from customers should be something thought out, not left to a bot.

Indeed, online interactions have to follow company policies, which in the case of Blizzard are very family friendly. They apply to all games regardless of game rating.

I think WoW is rated in M in some countries as well. Still does not change the language rules.

You know I don’t work for Blizzard right? It is not my “job” to fix the game.

They are not going to make you sit in chat and answer questions to help people. They are not going to make you stop and help someone fight mobs on a mineral node. That is NOT happening.

You really are safe here.

Blizzard has only had in-game GM chat moderation once. It was an experiment on an RP server in a known hot spot. The results were that it increased bad behavior because people wanted to trigger GMs. Further players stopped reporting thinking a few GMs would catch everything. It ended badly and they did not expand it or repeat it.

Not sure who said they fired GMs, but that was 2012 where they fired 600. They have since replaced and increased CS staffing.

Now, I do agree there needs to be more enforcement of the reports we DO have and it needs to be consistant. Failure to enforce the rules they have in place is part of the problem with the community in game and on the forums.

2 Likes

I would add 3) the group is insisting on voice chat for something that doesn’t really need or benefit much from voice chat. I get it if you’re raiding or doing a high M+ key or something like that but nothing less needs VC.

2 Likes

Correct. Free Discord means you don’t pay for it. You pay to access WoW and removing paid access from customers should be something thought out, not left to a bot.

Nah I disagree. There are plenty of reasons for autobans. Racial slurs being one. Exploiting the game. Botting. Telling people to “KYS” or “Drink This Chemical That Shares A Name With a Famous Manga”. Some things are worthy of an auto-ban. If it turns out they didn’t do it, toss them game time equal to what they lost. You’re going to have pitfalls in every system, what you need to do is weigh what you lose vs what you gain. What we stand to gain is a couple unhappy people on occasion who are then righted. While losing bombardments of racial slurs and hate speech.

Indeed, online interactions have to follow company policies, which in the case of Blizzard are very family friendly. They apply to all games regardless of game rating.

I think WoW is rated in M in some countries as well. Still does not change the language rules.

Still doesn’t change the fact that there is no official ESRB rating of the online interactions. Haven’t owned a box in a long time, but it used to even be on the box. Rules =/= rating.

You know I don’t work for Blizzard right? It is not my “job” to fix the game.

You are one of the communities liaisons. It is your duty to ensure the games development is steered into the direction it needs to go. That’s literally what the Community Council was built for. If you’re treating your role as a glorified forum user for fancy colored text, then you need to step down. You took on that role for free, because the quality of the game was supposed to mean more to you than money. It’s your job to communicate to Blizzard the communities expectations, grievances, accolades, and worthy ideas.

Blizzard has only had in-game GM chat moderation once. It was an experiment on an RP server in a known hot spot. The results were that it increased bad behavior because people wanted to trigger GMs. Further players stopped reporting thinking a few GMs would catch everything. It ended badly and they did not expand it or repeat it.

In-Game GMs did far more than moderate chat. You’re not actually fully correct on this, having served bans in Vanilla for Trade chat and whisper violations myself. Not proud of it, but yeah 100% I did some stuff in vanilla that a lot of cringy teenagers did back in 04’. Public channels and whispers were frequently moderated in-game, the line was generally drawn at Guild Chat and Player Created Channels such as /world. Physical issues were a more primary function of the in-game GM, such as item redistribution from raids, griefing, or out of bounds glitching.

Now, I do agree there needs to be more enforcement of the reports we DO have and it needs to be consistant. Failure to enforce the rules they have in place is part of the problem with the community in game and on the forums.

The community policing itself is never going to work though. It hasn’t worked for over eighteen years, it’s not going to suddenly start working. For like the thirty millionth time, Blizzard is applying deterrence theory, and it doing so poorly. What you’re suggesting is the community police itself. A community that was so bad at policing itself we removed master looter and implemented personal loot. We’ve been policing it ourselves and look where we are. The main reason it cannot work is WoW is not EVE Online. There is nothing the community can do short of right click report to deal with a toxic player. EVE can police itself to an extent because the player base actually controls who can and cannot partake in aspects of the game. At most now, a player gets their chat disabled and they go on with their day. They trash talk in m+ keys and then the key is dead. People act like most keys are people just sucking at the game, while that happens from time to time. No. Ego is what kills keys. Two players get in a spat over some stupid spec / item disagreement and they kill the key. Nine times out of ten the key holder isn’t even the one in the spat. That kind of behaviour will never go away unless there is rigorous, consistent, and relevant consequences for the player’s actions. Right click report? Right click report key killer. Should be right there in the list.

We live in the age of AI. For a company like blizzard, janky AI isn’t a thing if they don’t want it to be. If anyone of any game company has the resources to properly moderate player interactions, and automate out racial slurs. It’s blizzard. If you’re still that hard opposed to AI banning, you can at least AI delete the comment in the chat window just like Discord does.

I have been a Forum MVP since 2013. Tech/Customer Support, Diablo 3, WoW Community, and now Council. I have spent almost 10 years helping players. There is only so much anyone can do and colored text does NOT mean Blizzard listens to anyone. I can suggest things, and have for years, does not mean Devs select those ideas for implementation.

When it comes to moderation I am one of the biggest fans of strict moderation. I just am also a fan of FAIR moderation. I have been advocating for both for years.

Yes, they did.

You had to get reported even back then. They did not have GMs sitting in chat channels. It was rare. Now, if you happened to say something when one was in game doing something else, sure. Whispers though would be only something that would be reported.

That is if I trust the GMs I know and the folks at Blizz who showed me the system and talked about it.

I can certainly go with deletion of comment and auto report. I just want the actual removal of paid play time to be done by humans based on review of logs, not just some partial word a filter picks up.

They have started AI in WOW for reviews…but right now it has one word on the list. I don’t know if that is just a test case or if they plan to expand the system.

It has to be done carefully though so that normal players talking about grapes don’t end up with suspensions or bans.

1 Like

I thought WoW was rated ‘M’? Isnt that rating system supposed to determine whats allowed and acceptable in game?

Mature servers make sense moving forward. Even mature versions of chat channels you can opt into. Make barrens great again.

Being toxic / rude directly to another person =/= using offensive language in a joke / random mid night banter… you cant even assume everyone playing at 3am is an adult anymore because of server mix ups.

2 Likes

nor is making a wall of letters.

It is only rated M in Australia I think. In most of the world WoW is rated T or PG-13.

The game rating covers what the developers create and is reviewed by the people doing the rating. Those things are fairly “set” as in programmed and available for review.

Player created content (chat and names) is NOT rated at all. It is subject to the policies of the individual game company. In Blizzard’s case all their games, regardless of rating, follow the same family friendly chat and name rules. All forums, all games.

Think of it like a town square during a holiday festival. Just be nice in public channels and groups. Save the colorful stuff for your private friends chats/discord.

That is called Guild Chat or Discord :slight_smile: While Blizzard CAN penalize for what is said in optional private spaces on their servers, they usually don’t unless it is really bad. Your guild, or private groups, are at-will and currently subject to less rules.

Again though, if someone were to get really bad and get reported in guild chat that would still result in a penalty.

3 Likes