Yes because 170 hours for one item within 12 days is reasonable.
3 Likes
I wasnāt arguing that, focus on my words. You guys wanted no changes. No changes means no changes.
Yāall are adorable.
The Burning Crusade: Classic
3 Likes
I was against #nochanges from the start there were many changes that were quite good for players.
1 Like
Sure no changes! So where is that 5-6 week prepatch? Oh and why are we seeing 58 boosters, BE/DR before TBC full launch?
There are nice items from PVE too.
Iām with you 100%, Iām only pointing out the irony.
1 Like
You just keep missing the whole point of my post.
Iāma try and spell this out.
Iām simply pointing out the irony of people complaining about changes, until the change benefits them.
1 Like
Iāve been waiting on the pre-patch for leveling alts. Mount (reduced cost, no less!) at 30, nerfed XP requirements, buffed quest xpā¦ Thereās plenty of incentive!
Oh, and thereās the Draenei shaman that I plan to level to be my JC.
1 Like
Bingo, as long as itās not run by actiblizz because sure enough if they did they would find a way to screw ur up.
1 Like
Do you know why people are complaining about it though? Because original prepatch we were able to get the gear. Thus disabling us from getting it during a time we were able to is technically a change.
Much less the change they made has been proven to be extremely off and shortening it too far. No changes was never about āmake it hardā it was about keeping it where it was.
Yes I get your point, calling the hypocrisy, but there is no hypocrisy where you think there is. And even then, the honor change argument is not a no changes one. Itās just general people upset that Blizzard took away their ability to do what they were able to do in original prepatch.
Point being, back then we could get this gear in prepatch, now we cannot. That is a change. So it is not ironic. Heck have it at the actual values if we could have 5-6 week prepatch, a lot of no changes likely want the prepatch to be that long. Let us work for the gear.
You are aware that honor in 2007 pre patch was what we were getting before the nerf right?
Just a friendly reminder PSA.
90% (using your made up percent) of classic players donāt care about PVP.
Thank you and donāt forget to tip your wait staff.
1 Like
Why play any game when forum PvP is the best LOL.
Fishing, and cooking. In game and irl.
Personally Iād rather it stayed at 10x or were even higher. By participation would be amazing and everyone would come into tbc on an even playing field. Iād also rather a 6 week prepatch. Iād also rather some balancing changes and some qol additions. I recognize Iām in the minority though so I keep it or myself usually.
Iām just simply pointing out the irony. The people who wanted no changes canāt then want a qol change, randomly bc they liked it.
This post is like when that guy in the group that nobody likes but everybody tolerates says āCome on guys, lets go!ā and everyone just kind of ignores him while they continue doing what they were doing.
Except the overall honor per BG was about in line. Honor from HKs is currently bugged. Bonus honor was too high, but made up for the HK bug. Predictably they hotfixed bonus honor, but havenāt even acknowledged the busted values for HKs.
1 Like
From what Iāve read it was not, it was higher than it currently is, then nerfed just like this time. It just took them a week to fix it last time.
I get that we agree, but the change they made actually goes against no changes as it is not accurate. So I just donāt see it being ironic myself.