They cant come out with WOTLK , because that isn’t even a ‘classic’ version of world of warcraft , like Vanilla and TBC is . WOTLK was incredibly casual , introducing many of the things that killed WoW for many players . Towards the middle of WOTLK , epics were literally handed out to noobs . WOTLK was simply to casual .
They will NEVER , do wotlk .
So my question is , after TBC content is all cleared , what do they do next ? all of this stuff seems like a road that leads to nowhere . HOWEVER , here is my prediction that they will most likely do that will save this .
So after we have all had our fun playing TBC , and all the content has come out , blizzard will release Classic + or TBC + .
If they do classic+ people will have nostalgia , and will want to play classic again after doing TBC , so after all of TBC content has come out and has been cleared , this will be the perfect time for them to do classic + . And blizzard acknowledges this , and are currently working on ideas on how to implement this . The only option they have after TBC is Classic + , or TBC + .
So my question is , would you guys rather have TBC + or Classic+ ? Pick one because they will do one or the other .
wotlk is classic because it still had the old mana system and old world. Cata is “new wow” because of the new resource system and new world.
12 Likes
All 3 did stuff that was good and bad, classic and TBC are my favorite, and TBC the best of the 3, but they all have merit.
6 Likes
I admire your dedication to putting spaces before every bit of punctuation. That’s some next level ridiculousness to an already ridiculous thread.
7 Likes
I agree , TBC is also my favorite . I personally hope for a TBC+ , they could do things with Hyjal , Uldum , and other areas . Sadly i predict they will do classic+ instead 
1 Like
They CAN and WILL do wrath of the lich king. That’s the logical conclusion for this series, and it was the most popular. What they probably won’t rehost is cataclysm (herp derp). Put all your carebear complaints on that one. That’s the expansion that totally ruined the game; not wrath.
7 Likes
No , they wont . If they do , than what ? What will they do after Wrath of the Lich King ? What you think they will come out with CATA servers ? LOL . You are wrong and arent thinking about the future . The road you hope for leads to a dead end .
Oh they can make WOTLK, and they will make WOTLK. I’ll be playing that as well after TBC classic is concluded.
1 Like
As much as I agree with wotlk being bad you can’t just say the expansion that had wow highest subs to this day won’t see a classic rerelease.
Wotlk was fun though
Vanilla, tbc, and wrath will all come out. It’s stupid to think otherwise, it’s easy money for blizzard.
You think it’d be more logical to stop with crusade rather than wrath??? That’s absurd. Wrath was the last good game in this series, and had the last good story. Most players will want wrath again. It’d be quite dumb for them to do classic/crusade, but not do wrath.
1 Like
Wouldn’t be bad to have classic+ as long as it’s inspired by the drastically improved class mechanics of TBC, I am ignoring wrath because it was far too focused on area of effect damage by all classes and some stuff that previously in classic and tbc that requires some set up or thinking to use got a little too easy. I know why, they had to make others competitive with DK, but that was a mistake, DK should have not been a hero class, but only a normal class like any other.
1 Like
So lets say they do come out with WOTLK , you will just raid ICC for the remainder of your life than ? Is that what you hope for , Drain ? You would rather raid ICC for 10 years straight instead of play a TBC+ , which would have new content added to it each year ? Like i said you clearly arent thinking about the future . WOTLK will be a DEAD END and blizzard will lose money in the long run when players get bored of running the same raid non stop . Blizzard would make money from a TBC + much longer than they would with a WOTLK .
As opposed to raiding outlands for the rest of your life? Your dead end that comes sooner with less content is somehow better? You say we’re not thinking ahead, but we’re thinking further ahead than you. All your “classic+” preaching can come after wrath, rather than trying to deprive us of it.
4 Likes
I would want Classic+ but as long as people continue to play at these numbers when the BC has run its course they will come out with WOTLK. It was the peak of WOW subs and easy money for Blizzard. The real question is what they would do after that or if it would just be done?
1 Like
There will likely never be a classic+ tbc+ or any + for that matter. That would require a lot more time and money from blizzard for a product that doesn’t have guaranteed marketability.
2 Likes
Why are they wasting this opportunity? Blizz has said that they ran out of time to put in content in Sythilis, and abandoned a zone above tirisfal called Dragon ISles. Why not develop that? Do all the Vanilla stuff you intended to do but couldn’t. What’s the rush to move on?
Added by whom? The current Dev team? Do you really think they are up to the task? No thank you.
And Wrath will happen. While it was the beginning of what I hate most about WoW, namely CRZ and LFD, I’m hoping they will leave those systems out of it.
And as far as what Will I do once Sunwell is cleared out? Go play another game. ES6 should be out by then!
TBC + wouldnt be only in Outlands , after TBC content is all done with they would make Azeroth relevant again and add new things to it , like Tel Abim , Plunder Isle , and other islands and land masses we have not seen in WoW yet . Blizzard would make more money with TBC+ and thats just a fact at this point . People dont want to raid ICC for 10 years straight , sorry to break it to you ! People want to see new content added instead .
Lot of assumptions going on here. I don’t trust modern day blizzard to make anything worthwhile, and many share my sentiment.