It’s absolutely fine to vent frustrations.
To reduce alternative opinions to “you’re trolling” just because you don’t want to hear another viewpoint is ignorant.
This isn’t a support group, it’s a class forum. Everyone has a right to state their opinion, whether it’s agreeing with a point or not.
While you’re paraphrasing and reducing the argument, the data from the expansion unequivocally points to this being fairly accurate, specifically for the DPS specs.
It’s simply not a popular opinion to tell people that the answer to their problem is improving at playing the class instead of complaining to blizzard incessantly to make the class (even more) simple.
I supported the basis of this post and didn’t argue with it, because it admits that there should be a trade-off for more range (which is true), and also affords a solution for players that don’t want the extra range and would prefer power.
If you just don’t like the range and don’t spew nonsense about it being some punishment with no trade-off, that’s a fair opinion.
The players that have touched lfr/normal at most that are here complaining that the range “doesn’t work” haven’t even learned the class fully, or put effort into learning a different playstyle. They just want evoker watered down to 40 yds to avoid having to put any effort into getting better.
No disagreement here, I fully embrace that I trend far more towards enjoying the bones of the specs than most here.
It doesn’t make my point of view that of a “troll”, and real solutions don’t happen in echo chambers.
If evoker is going to get to a place where more people want to play and enjoy it (which is obviously a good thing) then contrarian opinions are just as important to that process as the “venting” forum masses are.