You have not shown where one soul equals one skellie. Yet a soul can be used to fuel various magics. A soul can be used to create portals, summon demons, cast spells.
A soul needs to be used on an undead - but the amount and dispersion of souls has not been addressed.
Again, your one soul = one skellie stuff is mere conjecture.
Yes I have.
Thereâs also the World Quest in the Broken Shore of various bones and souls being created into a friendly construct.
You argue your case equates to all situations. I argue the exceptions.
You donât shove multiple souls into the skeleton.
You imply the souls are a part of the bones they belong to.
If there are no souls inherent to the bones - then what are you talking aboutâŠ
No, I donât.
Youâre saying one soul can animate multiple skeletons simultaneously. Iâm saying that not only do we never see that happen, itâs factually untrue.
I never said they can. I said it is as likely as your unsubstantiated conjecture.
I said to presume one soul can animate 10, or 100 Skellies is equal to assuming one soul is required per skellie.
They are both unsubstantiated conjecture. You are full of unsubstantiated conjecture.
Yer gettin boring.
âCouldâ and âcanâ are different words. Thatâs why they are different words.
You have always been boring. Yet delightfully incorrect. Again.
I eagerly await proof of your 1 soul = 1 skellie farce.
They cannot. Again, one soul one skeleton as seen in Nazmir. As seen in Lordaeronâs animation: https://youtu.be/OC5MPeK0xgQ?t=715 As seen in the Battle of Lordaeron after the animation.
etc.
Seeing as youâre thoroughly one-upped, Iâm going to go watch netflix.
Work on your game, man.
Well I never said âcanâ. I said âcouldâ. You can not even read your own quote.
You keep arguing about âcanâ and acting like it makes you right. When your own quote shows I said âcouldâ - by your own quote.
If you can not read your own quote ⊠some other media is likely more understandable to you. Instead of Netflix, try Hooked on Phonics.
But if you spend less time spamming about your baseless conjecture, we are all better for it.
I would say the âGarrosh 2.0â theorized ending would be a far, far worse of an outrage. Considering how it wasnât so long ago and that his ending had a pretty bad audience.
Even Blizzard know better than to do that one again. Everyone is calling out how predictable and repetitive it would be. Iâm not really sure how to resolve Sylvanasâ tenure as warchief really.
You say that but the Horde fracturing to let the Alliance gain victory has been done three times already.
They seem pretty unified to me. Saurfang is sulking because of honor but the rest of the Horde havenât taken issue with their warchief. I know thereâs rebellion stuff being set up in this patch but I kind of hope it ends with both sides finding a common ground rather than more killing of Horde members who donât agree.
I donât think you really understand the point at hand. Youâre pointing to specific examples which do, indeed, involve souls - but then stating that that proves that all necromancy requires souls.
âYouâre wrong, as alwaysâ Sweetheart, I know you try your best, but do give it a rest. Iâm not sure if you know this, but headcanon is just that - headcanon. The phrase means that itâs something that you, specifically, believe, such as that necromancy requires souls. But hereâs the kicker! There isnât anything explicitly stating that ALL FACETS OF NECROMANCY REQUIRE SOULS.
Please, keep this in mind before posting further. Thanks!
The necromancy we see in Zandalar follows the same rules Word of God states. Word of God does not say âThe Scourgeâs necromancy is differentâ it says âUndead.â Zandalar follows the rules Word of God establishes. One soul. One skeleton.
Follow your own advice.
That is not stated anywhere. That is more of your nonsense head canon with no basis in fact.
The World Quest âAncient Bonesâ on the Broken Shore has a Brittle Guardian purely empowered with magic. The bones themselves have magical properties.
Khadgar says: âEnjoy your creation before the magic fades.â
He does not say âenjoy your creation before the soul becomes unboundâ.
There is a Skeleton raised with magic and no designation of a soul used. Opposed to your insistent head canon.
Your 1 soul = 1 skelie shtick is funny, but baseless. I only wish you had facts other than âpurple swirlies!â
Thatâs headcanon.
âMagicâ is not a magic school. Youâre trying to imply that âmagicâ means âarcaneâ but it doesnât.
https://wow.gamepedia.com/Magic_schools_(WoW)#Shadow
Incorrect. âMagicâ is the word Khadgar uses. Not my head canon.
Your argument falls flat if you realize Khadgar says âmagicâ. His wording. Not mine.
You have no evidence of the magic used in that quest. More supposition.
You seem to think your headcanon means more than actual words used in game by characters. Hilarious!