Secret Plan - We can prove Blizzard wrong about Layering and embarrass them!

Blizzard: Please don’t read this. It’s a secret plan. Thanks for your cooperation.

To everyone else:

So I’ll let you in on a secret to how you prove Blizzard wrong about Layering. You play Classic WoW. Everyone plays Classic WoW, doesn’t quit, and stays playing for months on end.

If the population does NOT drop and they are unable to disable Layering, this means they were wrong and they should have provided additional servers and not used layering in the first place. Blizzard would potentially be forced to create new servers and offer free transfers in order to avoid keeping Layering enabled longer than they planned. They would be embarrassed and proven wrong.

If, on the other hand, people DO stop playing and it gets to the point that they can simply disable Layering – then Blizzard was right. The community would be proven wrong, and Blizzard would have saved themselves time and effort on condensing low population servers.

So, to that end, prove them wrong. Play. Convince everyone else to play. Stay playing for months.

Okay… promise not to tell Blizzard this secret plan. They’ll be sooooo embarrassed if they were wrong. But, oh boy, if they were right, the community will surely apologize and admit they were wrong. Right?

12 Likes

what are you doing?

1 Like

Trying to be clever.

7 Likes

LOL :sunglasses:

Nope, they’d just keep the layering in.

Sadly, some people aren’t even going to start playing because of layering.

Who’s right then?

Who cares about “being right” anyway? Most just want the authentic experience, the “love letter” we were promised.

I’ll just copy paste the numbers I just posted in another thread showing just how many people have stopped playing the beta:

Currently online on the PvE server (alliance side):

12 priests
20 mages
16 warlocks
21 hunters
23 warriors
15 rogues
20 paladins
12 druids

That’s a total of 139 playing on alliance right now on the entire server and I think the pve server is alliance dominant.

edit - horde side :
10 priests
11 mages
17 warlocks
24 huters
13 warriors
13 rogues
20 shaman
7 druids
102 total players

1 Like

Or they just say screw you and keep layering with no additional servers… Kinda like they have now.

1 Like

Exactly. I think people tend to forget this forum is to discuss the game and bring in feedback about what’s working for you as a player, and what’s not.

It’s not about being wrong or right. It’s about providing your viewpoints and try to explain your thoughts and feelings behind them so Blizzard can figure out if their game is coming across the way they’d like it to.

That said, OP i see what you’re doing. You know, there’s a reason Taurens can’t be rogues :stuck_out_tongue: But i applaud you for the effort! It’s quite cute. #nochanges

Probably woulda and coulda been a secret if you made the title, “my thoughts on paladin”, and then leave the juicy stuff inside.

Having your title scream secrets doesn’t really make it secretive.

3 Likes

Here is how it’ll probably work: They’ll go with layering for the first few weeks and gauge player retention at that point in time. If there is more traffic than expected, they’ll open more servers to accommodate those players. If not, then they avoided expending resources on unnecessary server architecture.

2 Likes

Sir, I am going to have to ask you to stop posting anecdotal evidence that Layering is justified. You make it seem reasonable. Have you not read the secret plan? That flies in the face of it all and suggests that Blizzard is making a rational decision by implementing layering.

With that rational thought process I can only assume you’re a shill for “Big Layering™”. You make it seem like layering will have a net positive effect on Classic WoW. That doesn’t fit the narrative I’ve been told by the layering mega threads.

I clearly asked Blizzard to stop reading. If that’s not effective… then the whole plan is bust.

2 Likes

Trying to get this thread spiked. And the mods are definitely out in force today (working on Saturdays confirmed).

PVE server was significantly lower to begin with compared to the PVP server. Also, the only way you could get these numbers is through /who which is only going to show you people in your layer.

Not saying I dont get your point, but those numbers are strictly anecdotal and therefore cannot be used as a proper sampling pool statistically.

This thread was worth a good chuckle.

But OP does have a point. If the supposed 80% dropout rate doesn’t happen, then they’ll likely have to open more servers just to take the load off the existing ones. Layering helps with player-end experience, not server-end performance.

1 Like

9/10 would read again :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Which is awesome you mean. We don’t need those whiners. More room and less layering.

2 Likes

I don’t think you understand what anecdotal means sir. If I said that I don’t see a lot of people around, that is anecdotal. Giving you exact numbers is the opposite of that.

1 Like

I’m a data analyst. I know exactly what it means and giving specific numbers from YOUR OWN experience is, in fact, anecdotal. It’s your experience and yours alone and not reflective of the entire population or even sample population.

Just because you can give specific numbers doesn’t mean it’s not anecdotal. If a study finds that the average wait time in a restaurant’s drive-through is 5 minutes, but I claim it took me 15, my sole experience is anecdotal regardless of the fact that i can give you the exact timing.

2 Likes

I didn’t say “I think I saw a dozen priests” I gave the exact number of priests on the server. If you are a data analyst, you aren’t a very good one.

1 Like