yeah it definitely will. just get a motherboard that has at least 2 pcie 4 M.2 slot and stick an nvme ssd in there for for the game installs drive and operating system drive
1 Like
according to TPU testing the RX 6800 (non XT) performed as well as the RX 3080 in Battlefield V
1 Like
It will perform great still
2 Likes
So you’re saying CPUs that already render faster than most monitors display will do what with faster cpus?
Some of us actually have the hardware and can test directly instead of your random brattling.
They’re neck in neck til you hit 4K. There’ve been driver updates (you’re quoting ancient reviews). The 3080 if faster today.
I’m saying exactly what I posted, “there has been no actual professional testing with this unreleased CPU series in WoW or in any situation”
amateur reviews are done by amateurs or fan boys who want to justify their purchase and make things up. The “trust me I know what I’m talking about but have no evidence to hold it up” angle just doesn’t hold up.
great, care to link the tests? Not doubting it just want to see the proof
All and all, you seem to be a fool who runs their mouth. got caught, got embarrassed, and is now trying to find an angle to save face. I’ve asked you multiple times to justify your posts and you failed and pivoted the conversation each and every time. You want to keep replying with “only I have the true stats” that’s fine but you are not fooling anyone but yourself.
The problem is we’ll never get professional testing in WoW, mostly because it’s just not really relevant in the gaming or tech world. And even if we did, it would be too hard to actually accurately test because of the multiplayer component.
Closest we get is Hardware Numb3rs youtube channel, which I think is pretty good, and he did test the 5800X3D and it did pretty well. IIRC he tested it against 3600 and 5600, and it greatly outperformed them. I am not sure if he did a direct comparison with 13th gen yet, but if he did, I suspect it would perform favorably.
Then you missed the point: It doesn’t matter if the fps is faster than the monitor fps.
That’s right, we should ignore people who have the hardware and instead trust your reviews (ie the person who doesn’t have the hardware). 
Exactly my point. You don’t have the hardware and you’re talking out of your butt. You look at reviewers who tested hardware when it came out with 1 specific drivers. You realize new drivers might change performance right? Not that hard to understand…
no, you missed my point as I posted this in one of my very first posts as I stated above, you you were not so fixed on being right as being accurate you would have actually read my post and realized you are re-enforcing what I said not arguing against it.
#1 see below
2. yes there is a difference between an amateur and a professional especially an amateur liar such as yourself
exactly, so how do you have hardware that has yet to be released! yet you claim to!
Yes I agree but that’s not the real issue in this thread that has been hijacked. You have someone that has used the “400 vs 500 fps” in multiple threads in this forum as a way to prove their point. They are more interested in being right than posting facts. Now I’ve ignored it as hyperbole in other threads but now they are claiming they actually have yet to be unreleased hardware and know the test results of such hardware.
when asked how they came up with these numbers they stated
so it’s an example not an opinion and i asked what it’s an example of and their claim
so now they have the hardware to back up their claim on a yet to be unreleased series of CPUs
this guy is a clown, has been for a long time, got caught being a clown and is now tossing his typical immature hissy fit to save face. He’s also ignoring my post without realizing that none of his points actually disagree beyond the fact he doesn’t own the hardware because it hasn’t been released yet.
the 7th post on this thread by me
the 46th post on this thread by him
Either he fails to understand the definition of moot (very possible) or he doesn’t even want to read posts just post over people and claim he is right because both posts state the exact same thing yet he wants to argue over it.
I think there’s been some miscommunication here somewhere
The FPS differences are going to be noticed in the minimums, not the maximum or average which are usually going to be GPU or as you say, display limited anyway
1 Like
yes, you can certainly make a case for those CPUs in that scenario (if they perform as well as AMD says they will) and like I said above (and you reiterated as well) “assuming you have the right monitor and GPU”
My understanding is that the 5800X3D already achieves this. I’d find it hard to believe the 7000 series X3D chips won’t also, at least a little bit.
And as far as the GPU and display limitations go…I always thought that went without saying.
1 Like
most likely but how little (or lot) and would it be worth it?
Well based on history alone, I would get it over the normal 7000 series. Knowing they were coming is why I didn’t get the 7000 series to start.
All this fighting needs to stop. Put your rig on massive world boss raid. There goes your FPS.
that improved quite a bit when I went from 10900K to 13700k tho
1 Like
interesting, how big of an improvement did you see? This with your RTX 3080 on a 1440p monitor and stock settings on the CPUs?
In those boss scenarios, yep. Although, at this point I don’t have an apples to apples comparison because I upgraded before Dragonflight; but if I got to my son’s PC to watch him do world bosses (I gave him my 10900k, same settings, but with a 3060) in world bosses his dips below GPU maximum and he gets maybe 50fps, I stay around 70 on my 13700k.
In FF14, I found in Limsa Lominsa (the main city area that bogs down CPU limited) on the 10900k was around 60-70FPS, on the 13700k it is 90-100.
Thing is, the 13700K at stock is significantly faster in single threaded performance. Compared to 5.3ghz 10900K, which scores around 1400 in CBR23, the stock 13700K at 5.4-5.5ghz (stock single core boost) scores 2100. That’s over a 50% improvement. It seems to scale almost perfectly with FPS minimums in MMOs.
1 Like
many MMO’s still use the “one big thread” they are just better at tossing out draw calls to a few other threads to better “optimize” multicores. You figure the lows would improve with the better single core CPUs although the 10900k is hardly a slouch and the higher resolution would squish some of the difference.
Thank you, someone gets it.
Then show the WoW numbers from a ‘pro’ with each iteration of Nvidia drivers on Maxwell to day in raids, griffins and PVP.
Reality: You won’t get them. No ‘pro’ is going to put in the work unless they get paid (that’s right the reviewers are paid).
Hence the statement “per AMD”.
1 Like