World of Warcraft is the world’s largest RPG game, and has long been a home to diverse playstyles, with role-playing (RP) being a cornerstone of its social and immersive appeal. However, with the mega-servers and layering, the separation of RP communities has diminished. Because of this Blizzard has chosen not to add an RP-PvP or a RP-PvE realm, breaking 20 years of tradition. M proposal, is implementing an RP Layer Preference System, Blizzard can preserve the unique experience for RP players, ensuring that they can congregate within the mega-server framework while continuing to foster RPers.
If we can’t have RP dedicated realms, I have a compromise. It’s likely a bad idea, but, if anyone has better ones please throw them out
WoW has a tradition of RP Realms
Since the launch of World of Warcraft in 2004, RP realms have been an integral part of the game, attracting players who thrive on creating narratives, dynamic character interactions, and player-driven events. Each major server release, such as the launch, Burning Crusade, WotLK, has almost always included dedicated RP realms. This includes the relaunch of classic.
The introduction of mega-servers and layering, while addressing server capacity and queue times, has unintentionally diluted RP communities. Without a dedicated RP layer option, role-players risk being scattered across layers, diminishing the critical mass needed for organic RP interactions.
Blizzard could’ve done real server merges by adding Surnames, and letting everyone choose their last names for their character. But, they went with the connected realms options. And as the server technologies got better, less and less servers have been needed.
Proposal: RP Layer Preference Checkbox
If the future of WoW isn’t to add dedicated RP realms, because the RP community is smaller, how about a preference checkbox? You can still have RPers be a part of the mega-server economy and community, but allow RPers to separate themselves for their purposes.
OR
- How It Works:
- Players who select this option will be assigned to a specific RP-friendly layer when logging in.
- Layers designated as “RP Preferred” would prioritize placing RP-tagged characters (or those who select the checkbox) together. Non RP-tagged characters may join them, but, again, preference goes to RPers.
- Why It Matters:
- RP players can organically gather and participate in shared RP activities without the need to jump layers manually. This also allows RPers a chance to get away from griefings.
- Maintains Blizzard’s historical commitment to RP communities while adapting to modern server technologies.
- Benefits:
- Encourages RP players to continue their subscription, knowing their community is supported.
- Enhances the reputation of World of Warcraft as a welcoming place for RP playstyles.
- Reduces the need to allocate separate servers exclusively for RP realms, saving resources while catering to this dedicated player base.
OR REALM LIST CHOICE
The layers are already acting like their own servers anyways. General chat, LocalDefense, etc is already divided to your layer only. You can just keep us on the same servers and jsut add a realm name option such as:
- Dreamsythe-RP
- Nightslayer-RP
By choosing that option in the realm list, you can make it that they’re automatically sent to the RP layer. Make it a permanent choice.
Population
If we look at Classic Era at most times of the day, the plethora of PvP realms didn’t last long-term and all went to low-population. If we look at the RP realms, they all stayed medium population. This shows the demand.
Closing Thoughts
This offers a consistency with 20 years of tradition. Since 2004, Blizzard has acknowledged the value of RP by offering distinct RP servers or RP functions in the game. This remains an opt-in system, ensuring non-RP players are unaffected, but, gives RPers a chance to thrive. This will offer support as Blizzard improves their technology and continues to have larger and larger servers with their layering tech. (Hint: Add surnames Blizzard one day, when you’re ready to have just a ‘few’ servers).