So it’s just as ethical for them to be intolerant of you, by your own moral standards. Neat ethical system you’ve chosen to follow.
let me link you something.
its a ted talk. little on the bore side but check it out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORp3q1Oaezw
No. It isn’t the same thing by a longshot. Ethics have to do with the moral foundations of your beliefs. Conduct is your behavior and the actions you take.
1 Like
Those companies also don’t care about looking weak so long as their executives and investors are getting richer.
that’s the funny part…
and that’s also funny when applied to Disney.
it made me giggle.
for obv reasons.
I just don’t think you’re getting what I’m putting down here and actually that’s kind of sad.
“Cancel Culture” is what the über-privileged denialists say so they can embrace being a victim because they don’t think it’s fair that consequences for being an idiot dirtbag should apply to them.
They think they should be able to say whatever they want and face zero consequences for doing so.
1 Like
love you too <3
I’ve watched that before, and it’s not the same thing. He is actively trying to educate these people (and it’s something that works) he isn’t tolerating them, he’s fighting against their intolerance, but he’s just using a different method.
If we tolerate the intolerant, it leads to the death of tolerance. A paradox, but one that has been talked about in depth by noted philosopher Karl Popper. Here’s a comic that briefly explains it, although I edited out the racist symbols from the comic.
3 Likes
No really, I feel like you’re thinking that the first amendment should apply in your interactions with an employer that is also a for profit corporation. It really doesn’t.
To be fair before she decided to play stupid games and win stupid prizes, the whole story reads like she was being harassed and labelled a bigot for the apparent crime of not wanting to do what people were screaming at her to do and telling her that they hope she dies if she doesn’t do it.
Which doesn’t exactly paint anyone in a good light here.
That is why I say toxic, you defend those responsible who came out of nowhere just to influence more hatred and discrimination just because of a pathetic and stupid comment, and people who expire as scapegoats for being the cowards they have always been.
Well you did it, support them, you sure feel like SpongeBob in this moments.
One more idiot who thinks he has done a good deed that only leads to hell.
I like you would not mention that cartoon, because in the end it is a stupid intolerant puritan in which he only does the same of people who have caused harm and hatred to the world for several years, he would say his name but I think the forum prohibits it as always.
What if they did tho? Sorry but just like not ACAB nor are all BLM good guys.
Hes tolerating there presence. Actively embracing the fact that he has to live in a world where they exist.
and he then educates them. intolerance becomes tolerance. the human bond broke down social misconceptions.
do you think any of that would have happened if that dude got fired because of his ideals? his livelihood jepredised because of a simple mistake?
humor me though. in 50 years there’s a chance we get just the biggest info dump of contel pro. just like during civil rights movement.
That’s somewhat true but then could not any unpopular opinion be twisted to say its intolerant? And it sort of goes against free speech does it not. I thought that you could say “I don’t like x people and I wont associate with them”, BUT if you say “X people should be killed/violence against” then that part isn’t ok and def should not be allowed/illegal?
1 Like
But yet the cops are all bad, every last one, even the minority ones, but any BLM rioters are “inside agents”? Um no. That’s a bit too Qanon for me. I wont be humoring you. Sorry.
i wont deny that i am extremely tin foily right now.
but god i could be right.
He’s not tolerating them though, again, he’s fighting against their views, but doing so in a different manner to other people. Instead of counter protesting, he’s talking to them, educating them, and changing their views in that way.
And while it may be something we can all learn from, let’s not pretend that he’s being tolerant, because as I said, being tolerant of the intolerant leads to the death of tolerance.
If you want a real, and very recent example of that, look no further than the Republican party in US Politics. In the leadup to the 2016 election, when Donald Trump was sharing his intolerant and dangerous views, many people in the Republican party said that they should ‘give him a chance’ that he should be tolerated because they could ‘reign him in’.
But they couldn’t reign him in, and after 4 years you now have what many people have called the ‘Party of Donald Trump’ who savagely rebuke any of their fellows who oppose the now former President, who will defend him as if their lives depend on it, because as what happened on January 6th showed, it does.
The intolerant took over the party, because they tolerated his views and allowed it to spread and now the tolerant ones, the Mitt Romney’s and the Liz Cheney’s are the ones being suffocated within their own party.
1 Like
That sounds like antifa sentiment in some ways. “lets beat up anyone who says anything remotely unpopular to us, doing exactly what the Germans did in WW2, but then claim to be anti fascist…”
1 Like
is that what happens wants to use this medium to defend the same people, however that community does the same thing as fascist people and makes a great stupid witch hunt just for a word that he / she says.
In the end, what ends up is nothing more and less than being Puritans who make joke of their grandparents and ancestors so much just to avoid being an exhibitionist and transgressing a new ideology.