It’s the sales pitch that he’s giving us. Not the actual product.
1 Like
The points have already been refuted ad nauseum. He just comes back with the same points that have been refuted but worded in a way that makes him sound intelligent.
If the horse refuses to drink after being led to water, then the horse is a dead one. No need to beat it.
4 Likes
chatgpt mon gars? tu pence que te smart ou quoi?
1 Like
I haven’t been in this thread for its entirety and can’t speak on if, when, and where these points were actually refuted.
But I have seen a lot of arguments, and to say they offered a substantive rebuttal in any capacity would be a stretch, to say the least, so safe to say I’m not sure this is really valid.
1 Like
You think that institutions over the past decade (at least) have not been captured by leftist dogma, especially DEI policies. That’s fine. I just disagree.
I didn’t say backlash is proof of overreach.
I said that they were so unaware of the obvious blowback of such a terrible DEI-driven idea like race rating is evidence that they’re ideologically captured. In a bubble.
Otherwise how could they not expect the backlash?
How else do you increase minority representation without reducing it from racial groups elsewhere?
Their tool was explicitly designed to reduce the amount of white, straight, attractive, young men.
I think you can only think this if you take the most generous interpretation of DEI’s Motte and Bailey act and ignore how this actually gets executed in real life. Thes groups and Elite Institutions that do this are not shy about coming out against hiring Whites (and more recently, Jews). They plainly state it.
6 Likes
No. Not addressed. They dodge the real point. They talk around it, not to it. Saying “someone else said it” don’t make it true. If my point bad, say why. Don’t hide behind other words.
That not argument. That just insult. You don’t like how I talk, so you attack me. If my words weak, show proof. If not, stop wasting time.
You say my words sound “robot.” Maybe so. But just because words sound fancy don’t mean they wrong. They explain real things with real meaning. You don’t like word, you call them fake. That not fix problem. If you want fight, fight the ideas. No fight style.
1 Like
Everyone raging against DEI should go watch the new Superman. They’d probably feel a little happier with life if they did and not feel inclined to be mad about everything.
1 Like
Could be worse. Could be that cat lady from current FFXIV. Talk about annoyingly stupid bad writing and a character no one cares about.
1 Like
There you go, that’s more your speed. No hiding your true intelligence, glad you finally embraced it.
That was a long way of conveying that everything before this post was in fact chatgpt.
6 Likes
you did sound like a robot, chatgpt does that… thats not insult, thats facts…
do you know how pathetic and sad it is trying to win arguments in wow forums by using chatgpt… my god its so sad to see
you sound like a french canadian gamer
No, I don’t.
It’s funny how someone can be so vehemently against “wokeism” and then make the most woke-sounding statement in the same breath.
2 Likes
One of the ChatGPT tells, aside from the emdash which is widely known, is the tendency to do “It’s not x, it’s y” argument framing.
Make of this what you will.
6 Likes
So asian, black and middle-eastern males don’t like buff and edgy fantasy dudes with cool swords?
1 Like
Ah, dear interlocutor, your felicitous observation does not go unnoticed. Indeed, one might construe this stylistic pivot not as a capitulation, but as a deliberate exhibition to illuminate that beneath the ostensibly austere veneer lies a mind unshackled by pedestrian constraints. Far from “finally embracing” any latent intelligence, this ostentatious display is a rejoinder to the reductive insinuation that intellectual sophistication is some shameful secret to be suppressed. Rather, it is a clarion affirmation that eloquence, far from obfuscation, is the very sinew that binds cogent reasoning to persuasive expression. So, I thank you for providing the occasion to revel unabashedly in the plenitude of my rhetorical arsenal. May this serve as a testament not only to what I am capable of, but to the enduring potency of style as substance’s most elegant companion.
Permit me to further elucidate: having thoroughly traversed the labyrinthine depths of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest, a tome whose sprawling narrative complexity and philosophical profundity have compelled me to draw some decidedly singular and, dare I say, unsettling conclusions about the very fabric of existence. I stand infinitely superior not only linguistically but thematically, narratively, and humanly. This immersion has endowed me with a panoramic vision of the human condition and the cosmos that transcends conventional discourse.
Thus, this eloquence is no mere ornament; it is the manifestation of a mind steeped in the profound and the arcane, wielding language as both scalpel and brush to dissect and paint the contours of reality. It is a clarion affirmation that eloquence, far from obfuscation, is the very sinew that binds cogent reasoning to persuasive expression. So, I thank you for providing the occasion to revel unabashedly in the plenitude of my rhetorical arsenal. May this serve as a testament not only to what I am capable of, but to the enduring potency of style as substance’s most elegant companion.
yea you’re just embarrassing yourself at this point, you’re not even trying to modify chatgpt before copy pasting
just stop
6 Likes
And we’re back to chatgpt this is hilarious.
6 Likes
I am begging people who say things like this to go read press release about the tool. It has scores for 0-10 for literally all of these attributes I listed (and more).
Heterosexuality is explicitly a 0/10. Arab is a 7/10 and White is apparently a 0. Woman is a 5, Male is a 0.
https://www.wowhead.com/news/kings-diversity-space-tool-a-leap-forward-for-inclusion-in-gaming-327053
2 Likes
Brother, I really don’t care about this tool. That wasn’t my point.
The backstroke begins.
Your point is terrible if you don’t care about the tool which I am directly referencing.
“You’re woke for saying what the tool does!” is nonsensical.
2 Likes