That would definitely be useful, it’s a mess atm with the server names, we’re likely to get clusters of 15 servers in one!
They have done it in Asia where its actual server mergers, 3-4 realms get merged into a new realm that is created and they had a priority system that the oldest names get priority and if not you might have to rename your characters…
Fun fact: of the 5 regions, the US region is the only one that has never had a server name decommissioned. (EU has also had 4 realms closed down back In Wotlk when they created Russian servers, asian servers obviously had many more servers being closed and merged than that.)
1 Like
How do you figure it would have been “significantly” impacted?
1 Like
Because anonymous GD forum logic, from an insecure individual who has basically replaced their reality with that of their in-game communities and its culture.
There’s a lot of these types of people in the game.
Replacing video games as an escape from real life; “Google search: define addiction”.
This exact person basically said that all of Hyjal’s population are monsters and that connecting Hyjal to Proudmoore would ruin both the Alliance and the Horde population because all of Hyjal players are bigoted anti-LGBT monsters. Even after several of us, myself included, have stated that the LGBT community on Hyjal is happy and healthy and we would be more than welcoming to Proudmoore’s “unofficial LGBT realm” status. Whatever.
2 Likes
Wow, you seem very informed about the realm history, which are the 4 realms that were closed down in the EU?
Molten Core, Warsong, Shadowmoon and Stonemaul.
Ahh, I had started playing right in wotlk, but was a casual till cata, so haven’t noticed at all.
they were decommissioned around the time Wotlk launched, dont have an exact date but they were some of the first servers to go offline.
in Korea it last happened in 2013 I think, where they killed off 16 of the 26 servers at the time and merged those 16 servers into 8 new servers that they then connected into connected realms
they did something similar in Taiwan and thats how some servers like the “order of the cloud serpent” server came to be.
China I dont know how many they merged but they have a support article on the Chinese battle.net telling you what server your character would be on if you were on one of the deleted servers and just off that at least some 62 realms got deleted there alone!
Wow, chinese ones are crazy, and complicated, with those districts!
And yes, if the eu realms got decommissioned at wotlk launch, it’s not even a matter of paying attention, I started pretty late in wotlk, in 2009, people were recruiting for TOC and ICC and I had no idea what they were, and my realm, quel’thalas, had a very active trade chat, which now you wouldn’t really recognize, even if it’s now become high pop again following a new players period, trade chat is just not the same as it was, and it’s been low pop too during these last years, like wod.
Korea and taiwan have very few servers left compared to the other regions.
Think of districts as nothing more than datacenters… only they actually separate them on the Chinese realm list (something they should do with US servers)
Indeed single countries that are isolated from other countries and each other despite technically being in the same region (the have the same world quests/lockout timers/friend ID list etc, thats why you cant have a KR and TW wow account on the same battle.net). but my point is these regions have also been heavily affected by server closures, each region (TW & KR) has lost 16 servers a piece, and if that wouldn’t have happened their realm list would be much more bloated, especially Taiwan is really heavily reliant on connected realms, and has the highest rate of server connections among all wow regions (in percentage terms).
Any asian server with a sever ID above 2000 basically only came to be through mergers of old decommissioned realms.
Yes, true, they lost a significant number due to those closures.
Btw, since they’re about to be connected, did you notice the odd situation with alterac mountains? People said before it’s marked full but it’s dead, and on my check around end july it was still showing as full but on raider io it only has 30k people and abysmal guild progress, no mythic full guilds, only 13 hc and so on, normally full servers require 100k on raider io, so I have no idea how it shows up that high!
it was always showing as full, and is a prime example why the population marker on the realm list is useless.
Sorry that some people managed to convince Blizzard not to do the right thing. Hopefully you get a proper connection in the near future.
2 Likes
I know this is asking a lot, but is there any chance we could get a list of the “lower population” realms that have yet to be connected? Players and guilds at large could use this information to plan heading into SL.
2 Likes
Doubt you’ll get an answer from blizzard, but look at realm list, you can rest assured every medium and low will be connected till they become at least high, that’s the pattern I’ve seen from them.
If a realm happens to be marked as high but have hardly any people on the population tracking websites, like alterac mountain which is “full”, as you can see from today’s connections they will also connect it.
1 Like
Oh, that’s where all the new idiots came from. /shrug
Ahah, that’s a good one!
no worries you guys succeeded in segregation in 2020 huzzah