I never said rdruid didn’t have comps, im just saying a rdruid meta was never as bad as what we saw last season with hpriest
And mud you know this too because several thousand times on your stream you said its toxic how everyone only wants a hpriest, in rdruid meta ppl dont only want rdruids.
Druid meta promotes dampening and passive gameplay which are both awful. Also, don’t know why you brought up hpriest as if anyone is saying how much they love that.
My apologies, I was unaware that you’re special and the comment you posted I wasn’t allowed to reply to it. Even though you posted on a public forum, a place intended for people to have discussions.
As with 2v2, Holy Priests have been dethroned and are now very much an average healer. In fact, the healer meta seems pretty well balanced, with no healer being either completely dominant or completely absent. Indeed, from the data, it is hard to single out a “worst” healer, as even Mistweavers are doing decently these days. It does seem clear, however, that Discipline Priests are now the leading healer"
Disc #1, has a higher representation in 2s. In 3s both leaderboard and ladder representation Both Priest healing specs and & Rsham have a higher representation in 3s. But it’s a Rdruid meta? I face priest/rsham twice as many times as I do Rdruid.
tbf, representation can’t always be taken at face value. blizzard can nerf, for example, warrior all they want but their rep will always be high so long as they’re viable since they’re just a popular class (they’re currently still busted tho with 40% ms, but i digress)
rsham last season had a pretty high rep despite it arguably being the worst healer, it depends on what you thought about MW really.