I’ve been playing since Beta, but that’s not important. Trying to tell a story, paint a picture, or otherwise show the person’s character or experience in a negative light is avoiding the topic. That’s what I was referring to, and that’s what seems to be consistent with a lot of the pro RDF threads.
Another thing seems to suggest that the pro RDF folks are hoping to continuously level alts through Dungeon Spamming, which I did on 4 characters for WoW Classic, and then 1 more (from level 1) for TBC Classic as well as 3 from 60-70. Actually, forming Dungeon Leveling guilds was a great way to create community, in my experience.
As far as “fun police,” I’m familiar with the “fun detected” meme, but keep in mind that even though I’ve been playing WoW since beta, I only started frequenting the forums after the launch of WoW Classic.
This is also the same type of narrative that pro RDFers seem to proliferate. It seems reasonable that people who don’t want or don’t care about RDF would not post on the forums to complain about it (since there’s nothing to complain about. We don’t have it). However, there are still a lot of people posting against RDF.
The truth is, we don’t know what % is for or against or does not care. Pretending otherwise is just proliferating falsities.
There’s no real debate though. We have RDF in Retail. We don’t have it in Classic. The developers have stated quite clearly,
And we have had ample time to plan accordingly. The game is doing quite well, population-wise…
Of course, there is no new conversation within this topic. Everything for and against has already been discussed and at this point it simply comes down to:
Pro: “I want RDF”
Anti: “I want no RDF.”
Neutral: “I don’t care.”
And here we are. 