RDF instead of Heroic+

You cant support something before its been announced by someone else. There would be nothing to support, unless there was someone asking for this iteration of H+ which you refuse to show. Just show it.

Alright the entirety of the internet it is, get to reading. Dont come back unless you find someone that asked for this iteration of H+ before blizzard announced it.

Way to read again. Support to the comment I made. Yes I can support my comment which a statement. This support was me mentioning in vids pre wrath aka pre blizzards statement people asking for heroic plus as we are seeing it.

Once again prove your claim and ill disprove it you have not.

You read the entirety of the internet already?

Once again prove your claim and ill disprove it you have not.

You said it cant be proven. That means the burden shifts to you. Have you read the entirety of the internet because thats what you are asking for.

Yes it cant be proven as I have already mentioned there is those that have asked for it. The burden remains on you to prove no one has made that claim.

Alright, at this point you have proven yourself to be a troll.

and? a troll none the less can make a valid point. Which this is, your claim is false.

Then go read the entirety of the internet, there is my proof.

Don’t need to I only need to read enough to see your claim is not correct which I have done and as such called it into question. You are the one with the burden of proof to prove your statement correct and dispel my question.

Alright then where is the evidence the claim that no one asked for it is wrong? Provide it and dont say you already have. You increased this thread to 170 posts with your circular argument.

I do not have the burden of proof. Sorry thats not how this works.

You do have the burden of proof. Prove your claim as correct. As in order to make that claim you must have all the info already to make an absolute claim. I have already provided the location of the info to disprove it. Which since you are making an absolute claim you must of seen, or else couldn’t speak in the absolute.

No I dont. Just like someone saying they didnt steal something doesnt have the burden of proof they didnt steal something since there is no way to prove they didnt steal something. The burden is on the people that can actually prove that they stole that something. Or is that person not supposed to claim they didnt steal something because there isnt a way to prove it?

Your argument is so bad.

In the case of not stealing something in order to need to prove that you first need to have someone claim you did steal something. As such the burden in on them to prove that before you need to disprove it. If no one has made a claim of you stealing something you don’t make the claim of you didn’t steal something as no way to prove it.

This is no different you are the one making the original claim you need to prove it before I need to disprove it.

I didnt steal anything. No one claimed I stole something.

Its still up to the other people to prove I did steal something regardless.

I dont have the burden of proof to prove no one asked for heroic+ because its an unprovable statement so that person cant have the burden. The burden is on the people who say there were people that asked for it since its provable since you are claiming it exists. So where is it?

No its not, if you want people to believe you din’t steal anything its on you to prove it if you are making the original claim.

While no one will arrest you for you being unable to prove that as the law requires someone to prove you did, not the other way around non the less your statement remains in question while if someone has done like I have and provided the location of evidence that shows otherwise your statement is false and remains that way till you prove otherwise.

And how does someone prove they didnt steal anything?

Sorry, but you are just flat out wrong.

You don’t prove you din’t steal anything as such you don’t make that claim, as the original claim. Just like this case.

Fact is that statement is incorrect and should never of been made.

I can make whatever claim I want to.

How do you know its incorrect? You have proof of that?

I have provided the location of proof that it is all that i’m required to do, call it into question. The burden of proof is on you to dispel that question.