Rank 1 Titles Need to Change ASAP

I don’t know what it is but professional basketball is kinda gatekept by the best basketball players

I don’t know what it is but every time the masters rolls around it’s the same 50-100 golfers

I don’t know what it is but every year Harvard is gatekept by the 4.5 GPA students

??? Is this a serious thread? Do you think it’s a coincidence that Kalvish is rank 1 every season on every class? Or do you think he’s that way because he is better than everyone that plays the game?

Rank 1 isn’t “gatekept” by rank 1s. They’re rank 1s because they’re the best. That’s why they’re rank 1.

Is this thread a joke?

“HOW COME THERE IS A RANK 1 TITLE FOR THE PLAYERS THAT ARE CONSISTENTLY, INDESPUTABLY THE BEST PLAYERS”

???

5 Likes

R1 titles are NOT account wide.

They already don’t do this. If there are 150 spots and 20 people above cutoff are alts, there will be 170 spots.

Oh okay I did not know this!

1 Like

I figured, or you wouldn’t have suggested what you did! XD

That being said, it’s obviously a good suggestion, and I’m glad it got implemented into the game!

1 Like

Did I say it should be changed? Or did I say that it’s effectively an impossible wall if you don’t have the ability to play for 8hrs a day for years on end?

Or have access to Kalvish, or 8 alts that you log between to climb.

Acting like this isn’t the case is peak humor though, do better.

Nah, but you cherrypicked a response to a post about wintrading.

The 8 is definitely hyperbole, I feel like most people just leapfrog 2 with a 3rd to play with whomever

??? I never said that it wasn’t the case. I just said that the r1 players aren’t all no-lifers. They DO put several hours a day into the game, though. That’s why they’re at the top.

I’m just trying to illustrate that it’s not some massive wintrading/RMT conspiracy that people are so fond of parroting.

2 Likes

I’m not saying or agreeing with this either.

I am saying that a majority of R1 players (95%+) fall in the following categories:

  • Have little to no responsibilities irl, and thus can dedicate an insane amount of time to playing. This is not true for a majority of people.
  • Have a large swathe of other R1s to play with. Again not true for a majority of people
  • Have multiple alts (Bubblebuddy has how many paladins, Zentheon and Shards have how many locks and ferals?) and q 1000s of games for 7 seasons in a row.

The point being that the odds are stacked against you in a way that makes it effectively impossible to push in to r1 range without at least 2 of the above things being true. (Numerous alts, insane amount of time, or being in the crowd of r1s that do).

Palumor is an exact example of that.

Win trading / rmt @ r1 unlikely.

Question for you:
How many true, 0 time r1 players that don’t have 5+ alts are getting r1 this season? Full glad team, no R1s on the team at all. No alts.

1 Like

Okay, thank you for clarifying and I apologize that I misunderstood!

I think that’s a pretty fair analysis!

I just want to articulate the point that Fewer responsibilities =/= sweaty no life.

I feel like most of the r1 players are just college-adjacent people playing the game in their excessive free time.

What I don’t care for is when so many people lose a game sub 2k and go, “oh those guys are sweaty tryhards” because they faded a fear or something. I know it’s a semantic difference, but to use the same verbiage to describe an r1 player and some rando at 2k is vastly different.

Also I agree with this 100%. I know a couple teams did it in slands, but they all got banned and titles removed.

I don’t think any!

I think that to get r1 you need literally years of xp and hours dedicated to improving. It’s literally inaccessible to 99.9% of the population by design, so people who DO have years of exp and hours of practice will almost always perform better.

I think we agree on this also!

1 Like

i think its close to 0 and only happens if some high multi glad xp teams comp is significantly overtuned or some kind abuse happens. correct me if i am wrong but ive seen ppl complain in the past saying the r1 is a club and u wont be allowed in it unless they decide so. thats all i heard, not saying it true.

You can definitely get in to it, because a lot of them aren’t unbeatable. But I have seen and been witness to people sniping and dodging.

But if you’re like Metaphors for example, you’ll get ostracized after a while and then no one will play with you.

The r1 crowd is a fairly toxic group of players though, and anyone who argues that point is critically unaware of what all their favorite players were up to between 2012-2020.

Zev for example was a well known botter and ddosser in wod. Cdew had videos up of him for years on his YT, unsure if that’s still the case.

Here’s a link to Zev (Idiotferal) kick botting in wod: on mobile so can’t link properly. Mind you he did this to all 3 of his R1 titles in wod. They were also his first titles, yet now he’s known as an insane feral and everyone wants to play with him.

https ://youtu.be/vR2XIkerUzc

Wizk was a well known cheater, in tournaments and on ladder. Also a ddosser.

I’ll stop there, but other R1s are incredibly racist, sexist and wildly toxic. They’re all basically meta level but some of them hide it better.

2 Likes

Nah, it did attract the customers. It just didn’t succeed in retaining them.

Game’s not built for 1/3 to 1/2 healers. I’m not sure how this wasn’t seen as an inherent design flaw for arena.

could always remove dampening and add another dps/tank slot to RSS. lol.

Honor level should have literally nothing to do with ranked PvP titles.

3 Likes

Accounts already only consume a slot.

r1 isn’t

This hasn’t been the case since mid Crimson

Yes Nasrajin already confirmed all this lol

2 Likes

There’s just not enough reward break points really. KEEP top .1%, but add .5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 6%, 10%, 15%, 20% etc .

Why not. If you just just did it for the highest titles then it would literally only affect smurfs.

Not sure why you’re protecting rewards for smurfs.

Me zentheon and spagette.

Only 2 that I actually pushed on.

1 Like

Bigdam and warried also 0 time rank one getting their first 3s r1 playing together with an off meta comp

1 Like

I do have to disagree a little here, but I think it’s more a problem with the season than anything else.

I don’t think anyone should realistically not be punished for end of season qing for titles when not playing the rest out.

But NA is also more cliquey when ti comes to top of the ladder, EU much more willing to wintrade/rmt. This is nothing new.