I need to see average parse % per dungeon and raid attached to character Uldir progress. Is there a wow add on for Warcraft logs that can give me this? Raider IO is not the best indicator. It’s alright but we as a community need more tools to weed out the casuals.
3 Likes
Why do you want to see my crappy stats?
But raider IO is for elitists!
Might help me make a good combo of players. If I see you’re great at aoe and have high dps and have two good single target toons we can make a good comp. maybe a link to your average interrupts per dungeon based off logs.
I can see the threads now.
Hardly. Raider IO is mostly for Plebs
I’m going to guess that whoever it was who just filtered you out did not need any extra information from warcraft logs to do so.
Decent guess. Wrong but I like your imagination.
I need to see elitist toxicity % per dungeon and raid. Is there a wow add on for warcraft logs that can give me this? Raider IO is not the best indicator. It’s alright but we as a community need more tools to weed out the toxic elitists.
1 Like
I agree. If I can get nice people into my mythic plus group that also helps.
You can use quicklinks, it doesn’t display the logs in game but it gives you a link next to every character name which you can click and go directly to their warcraftlogs or rio page.
Raider IO is for the dodging of bad players.
Warcraft Logs only tracks logs that are submitted by players. As far as I know not too many people log M+ runs. Therefore there would not be enough data for it to be reliable. You might get one player who has run 15,000 +10s since August, but hasn’t logged a single one. You might get another who has run a few +10s, but only logged and submitted his single best run.
Raider IO has a much more comprehensive list of runs by comparison.
I wish Blizzard would take what Warcraftlogs and Raider io does and incorporate it into the the games base UI functionality and their own websites so we didn’t have to go to outside sources to get it.
Blizzard should make their own internal rankings system. Its a little insane that we have to go to third party applications to find out if someone is telling the truth about their experience. Perhaps even with a community upvote system that goves good and nice players a chance to shine in the sea of online players.
In reality the only people that leave mythic plus are those who are undergeared for it and dont know the keys. Having a ranking system can and should provide the following information.
Highest conpleted key on time for the dungeon and affix of the week that is being qued. Example “Atal’Dazar 10+++ necrotic, infested, bursting, explosive.
Average DPS Score from all wow data base for the players item level. Example 80% ilvl dps when compared to all Destruction Warlocks.
Community Commendations. A few options, maybe all. People can commend players for being friendly, leadership, patience and skill. Make it so you can only nominate friends once.
I wish this was just funny.
But I recall back when a little addon called Gear Score game out people making similar threads about how great it would be if beyond just gear score they could see how well people had done at completing certain dungeon/raids.
And now we have raider.io, the great cancer of our age, due mostly to people using it badly.
1 Like
You should know what each class’ strengths & weaknesses are. Based on this info & their io score you should have a good idea of what to expect. You can always look up their mythic/heroic parses if you want as well.
When I see statements like that, I wonder what people think would happen if there was no such system nor any viable replacement. Do they really believe that it would be just like a heroic dungeon queue, where everyone would just queue once a week for a +10 and get it easily on the first try?
You’re calling it a cancer, but I believe it is the crutch that allows a system that is primarily (and still best) aimed at an organized progression group like a guild or friends list, and at least gives it a shot at working for pugs for content that’s been thoroughly mastered. For those players it is another option that works sometimes and is better than the alternative which would be near guaranteed failure in my opinion.
Either way it’s all just a side show anyway. M+ is best for non-anonymous groups anyway and in that case no one is looking at raider-io.
2 Likes
You are not incorrect in the main. You will notice the latter part of the sentence that you quoted
“due mostly to people using it badly.”
As with any tool it has value and merit, but the way it is used is to often overly broad and clubbish. Not at all times, and not for all groups. But…go and review the dungeon finder for 20 minutes some time. See the number of groups calling for io’s that are vastly overpowered for the level of key. See the language and tone shown in the search comments. It’s perhaps merited, and perhaps simply meant to simplify group formers lives. It’s also small minded and mean spirited far to often.
That’s why it’s a cancer, not because of any inherent design flaw or intended purpose.
I am seeing a new world of the future where you can not just see people as stats but order them according to your designer wishes and contact only those people who fit your bill.
No more applying to groups and getting turned down, now the groups come to you, impressed by your clear rate or your AoE percentage.
So better work on those scores, pal.
It would spawn a whole new set of forum headlines
“All the good DPS are taken”
“Blizz, make top score healers raid with someone besides their friends”
“Guilds unfairly monopolize Tanks”
“Forced to raid with low score support”
“Team Leads duel for top score DPS”
But, in all seriousness, IO is a dreadful system that serves to incentivize the worst behavior, weakening leadership and shrinking the very community it is supposed to serve.