Oh no thanks. You wouldn’t have much to do because mommy won’t be home often so you’ll be all alone. It’ll end up needing to be an open relationship and I’m not supporting some random thot you pick up.
Yeah maybe, but show me where I am wrong? I provided instances where we know they broke their word. How do we know it’s not that happening now?
Can’t slap me if I punt you first!
If it is so trivial, then it is not worth all the threads made about it. Glad we’ve come to this conclusion. I look forward to the lack of additional posts complaining about pathfinder.
It’s one of those rare things that are trivial but holds a personal value to multiple people. /shrug. You won’t see the complaints of it going away because of the value people put on it.
As someone who absolutely despises grinding rep… it really wasn’t. I hate doing dailies and world quests, and I still ended up with pathfinder 1 just through gameplay and doing it a little at a time.
Pathfinder 2, I buckled down and did my dailies every day. It sucked, but wasn’t too bad. I didn’t do pet battle stuff, and killed whatever rares I came across but didn’t really hunt them a lot. Still managed pf2 in just over 2 weeks.
Edit: If we had to grind to exalted, I’d probably join you in complaining.
I can’t even argue. Where is the lie?
Agreed. Level boosts are for the cyclical player to not screw up my leveling enjoyment. Keep them away and put them at the head of the line. Thank you!
As for Pathfinder on the shop? No. Nothing that gives such advantage to the end game belongs there.
What I find absolutely hilarious is the anti flying crowd are usually part of the first set of players to get flying. If they genuinely care about their mount collection with only ground mounts or the scenery is so beautiful etc then they would not use flying. Even their flying mounts they will use exclusively on the ground. However they won’t even do that because they know but will never admit being grounded is lame.
Yes it does. Free to play doesn’t mean “someone else paid for my sub.”
… what?
SERVICES AREN’T BASE GAME ABILITY UNLOCKS.
So the way WoW tokens are suppose to work is 1 seller 1 buyer, and Blizzard doesn’t create them. I believe that there is more people buying them via gold then buying with money to sell for gold. Proof? I can’t really as I don’t and will never have access to their records. All I can offer is reasons to doubt their word which I already listed.
What?
(in the butt)
But you can buy boosts. That’s LOADS of character abilities!
Must resist…linking…butters…
That makes zero sense.
I don’t even…
facepalms
I’m out.
Blizzard can make anything a service. They’re selling, mounts, pets and even a toy now. People buy it. So yeah.
Also, is there an advantage to giving flying to the shop when you can earn it in game? That’s the assumption I’m flying under at the moment, is that there would be an option to buy it but a way to earn it if you didn’t want to buy it. S’how most shop games function. The good ones, anyway.
WoW is an international game played by people of varying ages and social backgrounds. There are more poor people than people who can afford luxury services in their lives like a MMO. WoW gold holds no real value besides buying tokens. Thus more RL Poor people will buy game time with wow gold. Also, there is a limit on how many tokens a bnet account can purchase for the year.
It makes complete sense. If you believe it makes no sense because in that scenario they are losing money you are viewing it wrong. The more players they have in the game the more chances they have of someone purchasing other services and/or gold. It’s about keeping people in the game just like other free to play games do it. Yeah they won’t make as much as they would if everyone was buying the tokens with money but… I suspect in this case people have lost so much interest in the game the idea of giving them real money makes them vomit in the mouth a little. So they depend on the shotgun style of getting money. Throw out a bunch of pellets and hoping one of them hits.
I’ll bite one last time:
That’s a ridiculous stretch. No. Just no.
No they can’t. A base gameplay ability is not a service. That’s not how definitions work.
NOW I’m out. My brain can’t handle the mental gymnastics you people keep trying to pull that are nonsensical.
I’m just bein’ silly, don’t mind me.
I would however, like to know your definition of:
I assume you mean anything that you can do in-game?