Put Naxx gear on the shop

[Hiten-grobbulus]

@Cauchy-heartseeker

Nothing you’ve quoted really addresses any issues. If you have anything to provide that’s concrete and not a bunch of rambling, it’s your responsibility to do so. It’s not my problem if you can’t or won’t.

YOU LITERALLY FREAKING ASKED ME WHAT POINT YOU MADE AND I QUOTED WHERE I POINTED THAT STATEMENT OUT! AND I USED THE OTHER BECAUSE YOU DIDNT KNOW WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT EVEN THOUGH I STRICTLY MENTIONED IT.
You know what, just forget it. Forget all of it.

All pro-boosters arguments are simply unreasonable and ignore the damages to the overall game that such a thing will lead to.

[Hiten-grobbulus]

@Coacholsson-bigglesworth

hes a shill findom who literally doesnt read other people’s posts before responding to them, just ignore lol

I should have listened to you.

[Tookewlforyu-netherwind]

Poor comparison, but kudos for the effort.

[Bearhands-faerlina]

You dont need Naxx gear to play TBC.

You need level 58 to play TBC

A =/= B

[Ardus-thrall]

@Hiten-grobbulus

All pro-boosters arguments are simply unreasonable and ignore the damages to the overall game that such a thing will lead to.

Except there is literally no evidence of that…

[Cauchy-heartseeker]

@Hiten-grobbulus

YOU LITERALLY FREAKING ASKED ME WHAT POINT YOU MADE AND I QUOTED WHERE I POINTED THAT STATEMENT OUT! AND I USED THE OTHER BECAUSE YOU DIDNT KNOW WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT EVEN THOUGH I STRICTLY

Citing garbage is citing garbage.

Good luck to ya.

[Cauchy-heartseeker]

@Ardus-thrall

Except there is literally no evidence of that…

But what about everything he typed then linked?

[Ardus-thrall]

The hilarious thing is he liked my comment saying he had no evidence and was wrong…

._.

[Bricklethumb-earthen-ring]

@Cauchy-heartseeker

Having leveled when TBC first launched (that’s when I started,) I can tell you that anyone leveling will likely find a pretty lonely experience. Since Draenei and Bloodelves will be accessible during the pre-patch, it’ll be even worse. Most people will be focusing on The Burning Crusade content, which is only accessible in a functional way once you hit 58. You’re not proving anything here.

There you go speaking facts again Cauchy.

We know they don’t understand facts.

[Cauchy-heartseeker]

I think they’re usjng alternative facts.

[Hiten-grobbulus]

You don’t see the irony in your statement. That’s funny.

[Ardus-thrall]

Stating a fact isn’t really irony?
But nice save.

[Hiten-grobbulus]

When my whole initial point was on the idea of calling every argument of the other side out as “unreasonable” is silly because of the generalized statement.

I stated those bolded words more of as a “F it” line to respond to his initial post here.

[Ardus-thrall]

So now you’ve gone from stating irony incorrectly to back peddling…

[Hiten-grobbulus]

Really?
It’s funny because my whole initial point in my very first post was commenting on “hur dur all other side arguments unreasonable” because saying something like that is just flawed.
In the end he just ignores most everything I say and acts like I said nothing so I said whatever and posted what he said just targeting pro-boosters instead.

You countered that with obvious fact, which I found funny because that’s essentially my original point. To blow off one side entirely is just laughably ignorant.

Either way I am out. F this thread.

[Ardus-thrall]

No one has blown off one side entirely.
The lack of one side making a decent argument is the true culprit here.

I’m still waiting on a legitimate anti-boosting argument that makes sense logically and is based on facts not opinions btw.

[Cauchy-heartseeker]

He’ll join a bunch if incomplete thoughts together to form “sentences” and copy/paste them after you poke holes and state he hasn’t provided any proof.