There is far more lore support for Zandalari Warlocks than there is for Zandalari Monks.
Especially seeing as how we can find Zandalari Warlocks in Zuldazar and Vol’dun, meanwhile there are no Zandalari Monks on Zandalar, nor do the Zandalari know how to be monks seeing as how the Pandaren and Zandalari have hated each other long before the Sundering.
And if Zandalari Prelates came into existence due to past appearances, then why not Zandalari Warlocks?
Please reconsider the class choices for Zandalari one more time before release. I understand there is a limit to how many classes a race can be, but I don’t understand why a class with far less lore support was chosen instead.
I know you’re joking, (You are, right?) but thank you for giving me the perfect opportunity to further elaborate on that point.
Zul’s Thunderforged in Pandaria is just a single event in a long line of hatred.
These two races have never gotten along, and although they’re now joining the Horde, they have not learned how to be Monks, nor is there a single Zandalari Monk on the continent.
Perhaps, but I’ve seen too many of those “That was just Zul!!” cries to somehow absolve the Zandalari of almost anything, so it wasn’t completely clear for me.
Because if Zandalari had all non hero classes alliance would cry. It’s really that simple. I remember at Blizzcon when people thought they would get all 10. It was non stop complaining on these forums. You can thank yourselves for no Zandalari warlocks.
The entire point of this thread is in order to work with the limitation in mind. Removing monks would then allow Warlocks (which are supported by lore) to exist.
Mostly about non-issues. This is a lore continuity issue that should be looked into.
