We already know what they’ve said, and how to take it apart and demonstrate their position on the issue is terrible.
no… blizzard sucks nuts because they are going out of their way to protect people from losing. That was NEVER a thing in vanilla… most people never even saw Naxx or AQ… should they remove those raids for fear that people will rush to progress in order to see that content?
the reason they gave DOESN’T MAKE SENSE… DOESN’T HOLD UP TO SCRUTINY.
1 Like
Lol fine. Everyone, I concede. You’re all right. Blizzard should just cancel WoW altogether because it’s not 2004 anymore.
I’ve learned my lesson: never try to go against the crowd.
You can say you’re just defending blizzard but I still think you’re anti-OG
1 Like
Yikes. I can see why you don’t get paid for this, but you could charitably defend the party line of someone that can’t afford to pay until you feel you can pull a salary from someone that can.
They can gate 6 phases of content but they can’t gate you upgrading your mount at 60 making it unavailable until phase 2 or 3 therefore still encouraging you to take your time and still giving you the unarmored mounts? Hogwash
1 Like
Let’s throw that on the pile of alternatives to never implementing the mounts while still boosting the supposedly all-important accessibility of them.
That would still be better than nothing.
Yeah. The devs are brilliant. Historical recreation btw
btw btw