Oceanic Realms Broken - Merged with US Battlegroup (Lag)

Absolutely needs to be fixed, unsubscribing otherwise! Why do we have a disadvantage against US players! @blizzard

I remember playing on 56k Dialup. WoW was unplayable by any REASONABLE standards. So I know exactly what Oceanic Players go through when playing ANY game that doesn’t have OC Server clusters.

Ping to West Coast:
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=245
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=186ms TTL=245
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=245
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 137.221.105.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 178ms, Maximum = 186ms, Average = 181ms

Ping to Central:
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=247
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=247
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=247
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 24.105.62.129:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 219ms, Maximum = 222ms, Average = 220ms

Ping to OCE:
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=241
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=241
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=241
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=241

Ping statistics for 103.4.115.248:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 6ms

7 Likes

#purgethemerge

#purgebobby

2 Likes

Yo this change is stupid. If OCE players want to play with US queue times on US ping they can choose to do so (and have). The rest of us OCE players choose to play on OCE ping with OCE queue times.

This change sucks, why have they just maimed the OCE group. Too much lag like this blizz, please revert this.

can anyone help my arathi basin is LAG :rage:

its big LAGSSS big like this —>>> LAGS!!! not a small lags like this —>>> lags

3 Likes

chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk? chocolate milk?

americans are beyond insufferable. revert pls :slight_smile:

1 Like

Hahaha so true

#PURGETHEMERGE

1 Like

Please god revert it.

Are you having a laugh?

5 Likes

Guess blizzard started outscouring decisions to their local spastic centre as part of community outreach.

4 Likes

My lag is so bad the wow music changed to this

1 Like

You laggin boss? I think you hit your macro a few extra times, maybe it’s me. Hard tell when the dude I just sapped did the electric slide half way across warsong gulch.

4 Likes

Unsubscribed due to this unnecessary and unwanted change

1 Like

I think you should provide your oceanic ping for comparison with the US. Mine is below. Its clearly a bit worse but honestly i havent noticed a difference between the 20ish ms ping and 200ms ping ingamge. shrugs

Oceanic
Pinging 103.4.115.248 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=246
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=246
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=246
Reply from 103.4.115.248: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 103.4.115.248:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 134ms, Average = 50ms

US West
Pinging 137.221.105.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=623ms TTL=239
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=239
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=239
Reply from 137.221.105.2: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 137.221.105.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 169ms, Maximum = 623ms, Average = 283ms

US Central
Pinging 24.105.62.129 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=318ms TTL=236
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=236
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=236
Reply from 24.105.62.129: bytes=32 time=219ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 24.105.62.129:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 217ms, Maximum = 318ms, Average = 244ms

this i agree with. the complaining in a few of the wsg games was insufferable. i copped a lot /spit i during ranking for being a ret (ignore list was substantial) but i’d take that any time than the complaining from some of the folks on the NA realms in bgs… XD