link
Google is your link
No interview took place, you lied about it.
Yes it did
Very weird to lie about an interview just to support your failing argument about optional difficulty levels you donât even have to do.
1 Like
Very weird to be this bad at google at your age.
âI donât think weâre married to one idea.â
âWe want each raid to stand on its own.â
htt ps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np3z7mO0rYk
This is what was actually said in the last interview, so quit spewing lies as you have about why SoM failed.
They said they arenât doing resistances again in BWL in the interview.
Thanks for link fam.
Good. They can do different difficulty levels based on increased mechanics instead. Thatâs how they should have done MC anyway.
We donât need different difficulties.
And my post specifically argued against doing resistances for BWL/AQ/Naxx
You saying, âThey arenât changing AQ or NAX,â is not supported.
Yes it is. They said this a long time ago. They arenât changing AQ or NAX because they think those raids were hard enough already.
Yes, but many other people do.
Beargers can do the lowest difficulty.
No they donât. That is why most people have quit.
Quitting = not agreeing with how the game is.
heat difficulty is fair and balanced. its all well balanced. you are not forced to do anything.
You donât know why anyone has quit other than a small handful of people around you.
Provide evidence that supports people quitting due to multiple optional raid difficulties.
Got a source for that? The interview I posted specifically said SoD is experimental and will continue to be which contradicts your statement.
I can read a chart that shows we went from 486,000 raiding characters to 40,000.
LOL
Provide evidence that shows those 6,000 people quit due to multiple optional raid difficulties.