No Player housing

It is not the same thing as PLAYER housing. You know doggone well what I meant.

4 Likes

FFXIV doesn’t have to sacrifice raid tiers to get its player housing out I dunno why GD acts like they can only have one or the other.

3 Likes

Nope? You said an Inn wasn’t housing, but I just proved you wrong.

I think it’s worth a try as long as it doesn’t break the budget. :dracthyr_sweat:

1 Like

You proved you don’t understand what Player Housing is. :person_facepalming:

4 Likes

I do know what it is lol, it’s just a house owned by players to decorate their homes and do whatever with it. I’ve played a game with housing before and it isn’t all that. Besides, an INN is housing, just isn’t owned by players

If you don’t want it, and it comes, no one forces you to use it. The worst that can happen is a required intro quest and then you can never return again.

3 Likes

Then you do know that an Inn isn’t Player Housing. :rofl:

2 Likes

Yes, but it’s housing. Some person said the people of azeroth don’t have a place to sleep or something, but we do.

Pokemon is it’s own game, yet people love pet battles.

And why Transmog? Why not play a game with dress-up in it?

1 Like

I just googled that definition and had no results. Every version I saw says “a public building”.

1 Like

So you’re contradicting yourself??

1 Like

Bliz doesn’t want to get housing or anytime soon cause of they did it right then the Horde garrison would have some real mud huts to contend with.

“It’s dumb because I said so” :nerd_face:

4 Likes

Ah just what we need, yet someone else who feels the need to make a separate post about Player Housing when they could just as easily put the comment onto one of the many recent posts about the subject.

You add nothing to the conversation, its all just click bait.

1 Like

And as we all know, they’ve never added dumb things to the game before. :wink:

1 Like

op·por·tu·ni·ty cost

  1. the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.

“idle cash balances represent an opportunity cost in terms of lost interest”

1 Like

You heard it here!

1 Like

Yeah because the idea of “mythic mythic mythic mythic mythic plus + mythic plus plus mythic +++++” the toxics are crying for is a better use of dev time surely lol…

1 Like

Look I get what you saying and normally agree BUT unless a player housing advocate donates money to blizz specifically for creating it, blizz would have to allocate resources from other areas so technically it would take away from peoples experience.

I was really into the idea of player housing until Garrisons now I’m not a huge fan (wouldn’t hate it but not advocating); everyone isolated , achivements required to get static objects (statue etc) and feels more like a solo player thing (encouraging multiplayer is better). I’d probably prefer guild housing over player housing but I’d much rather them get other content right first

1 Like