Just because it comes out of your mouth doesn’t make it true. In my experience, most things that come from you are wrong. So wrong that it is physically draining for me to read any of it.
Akiyass doesn’t actually generally counter statements. Akiyass just generally plays at using invincible ignorance fallacy.
Until Word of God states which one is canon and the others are no longer canon.
Which generally doesn’t happen that much. And Word of God can go yelling as much as it wants. If it differs from what the player actually experiences, then it’s a crappy Word of god.
According to you it does happen:
yes of course.
Isn’t that how Blizzard approaches books? Mostly canon until they retcon things? They even intentionally make game and book events contradictory.
That’s how Blizzard approaches canon in general, I think, not just the books. And can change again any time after.
Exactly, so what’s the point in arguing continuity?
There isn’t. The only point is discussing whatever the continuity is at any given moment.