NEW tinker CLASS and NEW WEAPON (One-handed pistol/crossbow)

Community General Discussion
41

I’d be so down for this, I think you could make the argument that all classes can be a tinker, all races have some type of engineer so, it could work, I would much prefer this over Evokers and Dracthyr in general in all honesty. Great Ideas

42

Yeah but I love evoker xD. She’s my next 80.

43

Comes to the forum, doesn’t want to debate their opinion. What’s it like?

44

I’d like to talk to you about it, instead of getting offended and running off like a toddler. My questions would be do you think the role of engineers and their items is prevalent enough to make an impact to game play or is it valid to think a class would be able to explore the fantasy of being like a Gazlowe or Bomb Squad members with guns, mechs, bombs, turrets? Also, if Tinker is not acceptable by your standards, what class would be? Personally I’d like to see a Tinker, Necromancer, and Witch Doctor class.

45

We are never getting this class.

Yall ask for it every year and blizzard always says no

46

We have a necromancer. Its called unholy

47

I’ll always click like on a tinker thread, but I see no reason to add new ranged weapons to the loot table that are just smaller versions of what we have.

I also see no purpose in any race restrictions at all, given that is something to move away from in general and every single race can already learn engineering.

I also think your class design ideas learn a little far into the “silly” theming of goblin and gnome design.

1 Like
48

I mean a caster iteration that has been in the game as enemy npc’s since classic. Also concerning your other comment, why are you so adverse to people expressing thoughts and creative thinking on classes? No, I’m not saying you are not allowed to critique things, but I find it interesting that you just come in the thread and shoot down ideas lol.

3 Likes
49

There would be no point to a caster necromancer as its ether gonna play like unholy or affliction of a mix of both

And thsi idea has been pitched for ten thousand years blizzard isit doing it. There not going to.

50

So, whats ur idea for a new class?

1 Like
51

And Evoker’s are really just a bunch of things mages were asking for but a completely new class for a race no one asked for lol. Would not be so far from the norm to then add a necromancer class. The only difference between the two being necromancers being something the fanbase actually wanted for a long time, as too are tinkers and other things Blizzard ignores to force in half-baked content. Rather nurture the creative fanbase than the lazy actions of the developers.

1 Like
52

Dont have any. Never claimed to

53

I wouldnt call drac or evokers half baked content

54

This is the most extensive post I seen on tinker yet. Ima have to read all this when I go to eat.

1 Like
55

There’s nothing silly about us! But yes, each race should have their own thematic tech

1 Like
56

That’s your opinion which you can def have, they are the most out of place additions that really seemed shoehorned into a game with a community that asked for many other things for years that they just ignore. If we were to play dragon-like things would much rather play a drakonid like many others.

1 Like
57

I would. Evokers only exists since DF while tinkers/sappers have been in wow before wow was a game. It has been in the RTS, Moba games and npcs in wow since forever.

Evokers are just things mages wanted but didn’t get and got turned into little aspects instead.

58

Evoker was and still a great addition to the game. To say its not is just hard core copeing

59

Lol the utter disappointment when the drackthyr showed themselves. The forums lost their minds.

1 Like
60

You are saying your opinion is fact, is that not copeing? lol

1 Like