Sorry, I tried to maintain a fairly nuanced and good-faith dialogue with you, but you tipped your hand with this one.
You are acting as a mouthpiece for your dogmatic ideology, and it is plainly obvious that you don’t care about individuals, equality, or resolving the root causes of inequality in the country.
You care about your own in-group, advancing your own agenda, and debasing anyone that doesn’t agree with you. You see individuals as mere stand-ins for their most generalized characteristics on a page of statistics.
The scenario you paint is presumptive, and conveniently adheres to your inability to see anyone as anything more than their group identity.
Moreover, it does nothing to address the root cause of why the “latter” person in your tirade is in the position they are in; a broken education system and an abandonment of the impoverished by government completely independent of race, gender, orientation, or any other characteristic that you insist on placing judgements on.
This is bald discrimination in the guise of compassion, and until you understand that you cannot apply group statistics to individuals wholesale, and that compassion toward one group exclusively is, in fact, not compassion at all, you will remain a possessed ideologue that does little more than parrot talking points from the pseudo-religious critical theory playbook.
I enjoyed the chat at first, but I believe I’ve made my points clearly enough for any subsequent readers to make their own opinions of, and am in no mood to talk a person consumed by subservience to ideology out of their sideways beliefs.
Please, do tell more of the spoiled and their ill-gotten gains. I’m sure we’re all riveted. /s