Just watched Bellulars video on the supposedly new “survey” that got sent to some players .
If this is for new specs and you’re listening blizzard , it’s time to add Shaman TANKS !! Do it , SOD has it. Why not retail ?
1 Like
The survey is definitely fake. Looks like it was written by AI then passed through google translate.
And yeah, the lack of any shaman tank as a potential spec option on a survey about potential new specs is a big indication it’s fake.
8 Likes
Because it was translated? The original source is German.
I don’t know why you think it’s fake though. Blizzard regularly sends out surveys.
Surveys where they forget what Titans are? Remember Gilnean harvest witches exist but forget they are druids? Where they just rip classes straight from FFXIV?
5 Likes
Not a real survey.
2 Likes
And we know things in german are never fake
The amount of survey deniers is kinda shocking, “I didn’t get it so it must not exist”. Is that the narrative here or what?
Regardless of people focusing on the survey validity… I would love to see Shaman tanks. That said any new class/spec etc… is welcome.
No, it’s that the survey had a bunch of nonsensical stuff in it like a Titan empowered class using shadow magic, Gilnean harvest witches no longer being druids, and classes ripped straight from FFXIV.
2 Likes
Even if it was real what can we conclude from such a survey?
That literally every class idea anyone could imagine is currently being considered as a potential future option?
Ok. That’s nice. I assumed as much.
1 Like
The glaring omission on it is no void class. A class relevant to the current story arc that is somewhat popular class suggestion not being on a survey of potential classes is a red flag.
You mean the discipline and shadow priest that I currently main and that is already connected through lore as well as gameplay to the current big bad?
Personally I’d be a bit disappointed if they went through all of this trouble to connect priests to Xal and then said at the last moment “Wait, we meant for a different ‘void’ class to be important here.”
I mean, the survey included a class that was just mages with a different name. 2 different classes using titan tech. 2 classes ripped straight from FFXIV.
But not a 2nd void class in a void story arc? Just seems weird. Redundancy clearly wasn’t an issue in the survey.
3 Likes
I lean toward it being fake and if not fake being essentially a non-factor.
I can say from secondhand info that a REAL survey before this was about nothing but MTX sales and what amounts to F2P models.
That’s a far bigger red flag on subject alone than this one about classes is.
I did not take this survey, did not accept their conditions, and no info was exchanged across Blizzard services, so onlookers can shove the NDA talk, thanks.
Fahrvergnügen
Yeah, Titans are super well known for using shadow magic. 100% real survey.
Titans are known for being steeped in Magic, including Magic from the Great Dark, which is where they, and the void, come from.
New specs are cool and all but if they keep putting off Tinker as a class I’m gonna freak out. 
They are steeped in ARCANE magic. Go look at the WoW cosmology chart and tell me where the Titans are.