Literally incorrect on both counts. Try. Again
Literally posted by the blue saying they use a data analytics and the data was wrong. Literally multiple streamers showing how players reporting you can get you d/c and silenced without being in a bg.
So yea literally correct.
I already explained it in detail for the kids who cant read good and didnt understand the blue post. Maybe scroll up and educate yourself
Fanboys will fanboy. Youâll never win that argument.
1 Like
You wont win because youre literally wrong. But sure⌠huff that copium
âDonât believe your lying eyes.â
Thank you for pointing this out. AFKers mad they canât ruin the game for us anymore.
Yea yet he ignores the videos and pretends the gm reviewed the data in 2 seconds at 2 am.
Metrics on a data analytics and an actual review is not the same things. For them to screw up this many shows there was 0 real human reaction other than being an orc peon going âwork workâ.
Even I do CSR work at a MUCH MUCH larger company and I know that things get flagged with 0 human review that later we end up having to fix the account.
1 Like
Blizzard already reviewed all the bans. If you are still banned you were a bad actor. Enjoy your ban and learn from it.
My only concern is the many shall we say, mentally challenged, that donât understand the difference between tactical defense, or ambush tactics, and being afk. But Iâm spamming BGs regardless because, whatever. Anyway, best luck to all I hate that anyone is being unjustly banned. Agree about the sarcastic top tier developer.
Ah yes âthe video.â How could I possibly have forgotten about âthe video.â You know âthe videoâ that clearly you have no link to but for sure shows youâre absolutely correct. 
Itâs not that complicated. I honestly donât understand why yall are having so much trouble understanding this. Their human reviewers are acting off data. The data collection was flawed or incomplete in some way which led to the bans. Itâs like if jurors are given bad evidence. That doesnât mean the verdict is âautomatedâŚâ But if the system theyâre judging based off is giving them inherently flawed data itâs going to lead to bad verdicts.
Yea that checks out
It does. The original design of AV wanted lower level players in the bracket to do the more miscellaneous tasks scattered throughout the battlefield.
The whole point of AV is to be a massive war of sieges, attrition, resource consolidation, cumulating to heavy NPC help to further the push against various chokes.
Non level capped players exist in the bg to support the team. Not to top frag.
But, I digress. 58 boosted rogue in communal gear with 80 posts on the forums with the name âpvpmusclesâ just screams troll, so, you probably donât actually care and are just spewing nonsense to cause disruption.
1 Like
Yea thatâs all great in theory. But we all know thatâs not how AV has been played for any of classic. I havenât even seen an objective completed in literally years.
It happened a lot in vanilla classic, but that would require playing.
many examples of ban first appeal later.
Itâs not theory.
This is how AV is âsupposedâ to work. No oneâs fault but Blizzards that they allow AV to award more HPH for a loss in record time, than a win via objective completion.
That said, whether players do or donât do it is irrelevant. The fact still remains that this is why the brackets for AV are the way they are currently. They exist so lower levels can still participate without needing to frag players.
This is also why in 3.2 Blizzard gave level 80s their own bracket, because the meta of AV changed. Why we donât have the 70-79 bracket in prepatch with the 3.4 client is beyond me.
1 Like
Yea thatâs been addressed months ago. There is a âsilenceâ system that will DC you if youâre mass-reported but that doesnât trigger any kind of automatic ban. Asmon DID get a short ban for âabusing the report systemâ by asking everyone to report him, but being a streamer of course they overturned itâŚ
Try again
Staysafe probably deserved a ban years ago for being a nzi but thatâs neither here nor there.
You understand those are the sameâŚ
You know what? NevermindâŚ
The fact that a lot of you donât seem to understand the problem with this is very appalling. Youâre saying âif youâre not afk you have nothing to worry aboutâ. Being AFK isnât even the problem that is causing people to worry about queueing.
How many people got falsely banned because others didnât like that they were either leveling in AV or because they were a boosted character? Sure some of them got overturned but the fact that a CS Rep not only said each case is looked at by a person (which was a complete lie) Or the fact that he even said that if youâre playing an obj youâre wrong.
The whole system is automated, people abuse it. Gasp who would have known?
You have zero evidence of that and in fact everything WE DO KNOW indicates youâre wrong.
But keep shouting that the earth is flat. You tin-foil kids are unbelievable.
Whatâs blizzards boot taste like?
1 Like