I posted a direct quote of the EULA section prohibiting multibox software. Here it is again:
Cheating: Create, use, offer, promote, advertise, make available and/or distribute the following or assist therein:
any code and/or software, not expressly authorized by Blizzard, that can be used in connection with the Platform and/or any component or feature thereof which changes and/or facilitates the gameplay or other functionality;
1 Like
Did that “fact” come out during your latest visit to the bathroom?
Honey, made up nonsense is not getting you anywhere.
1 Like
maybe because you had a real issue unlike Wog who is only feeling wronged in his own mind and he is listening to a lawyer that only he can hear
2 Likes
Not a lawyer, My First Picture Dictionary.
Except it doesn’t do anything of the sort. You’ve redefined the “change and/or facilitate” portion so broadly that it applies to anyone who plays the game.
And no, that’s not a fault on Blizzard’s end. That’s a problem with you and your deliberate misunderstanding so you can keep arguing without a real point.
4 Likes
maybe someone should send him a book on law I wonder if they have a version of legalese for dummies?
2 Likes
Wowhead is expressly authorized by Blizzard (linked and mentioned many times) and it’s hilarious to think about what their legal team would do to that site if they weren’t closely tied with its makers.
So Wowhead is completely authorized, but the WoW Wiki article on multiboxing, which is also linked and mentioned by Blizzard, is not authorized? You can’t have it both ways.
3 Likes
He didn’t use WoW to sell anything. He sold his own software that he made, nothing copyrighted. Enforcing criminal copyright penalties here is using copyright law in a way it was not intended.
The software could only perform as advertised when used in conjunction with Blizzard’s software. It’s a parasite program. It can’t do anything on it’s own and nobody is going to buy it just to have it sit on their hard drive.
3 Likes
Interesting to see you here defending a criminal bot scripter.
Obviously you have regard for neither laws nor ethics, so I guess it’s all about what gives you personally some advantage.
Are you worried multiboxers are competition to botters?
If he didn’t use WoW to sell anything, then what game was his software used in conjunction with? It wasn’t made to bot WoW was it? Selling 100,000 coppies for a WoW-related service using IRL money, or something to that effect which ended up becoming a financial hit to Blizzard in some capacity, where a judge who looked into this case somehow saw this software developer was in the wrong. I can’t quite make out why though
2 Likes
so in other words your not upset over multi boxers your trying to use the EULA to find a way to blame Blizzard for banning botters and gain leverage to legally sue them for doing so in order to undo that clause and allow botting to run unchecked
see I can twist a context around to fit an insane narrative too
6 Likes
Meh. Just let them keep spamming this multiboxing topic. They are just advertising it by exaggerating how rampant it supposedly is. Some folks who browse the forum will see a thread like this, and be like cool multiboxing looks fun, I might have to give that a try. Keep up the good work op. Blizzard appreciates the your business, and the free multiboxing advertising
1 Like
cant remember but did someone already use the skateboard meme in this thread yet? if not heres a good time to do so
2 Likes
Plot Twist: These players are keeping economy healthy
Something that is permitted is by definition, not cheating.
2 Likes
Botters and multiboxers aren’t the same thing at all. Botting is illegal, multiboxing is legal.
1 Like
yeah but your trying to point out something logical to the OP which obviously doesn’t register to them hence the reason he made this entire thread claiming Blizzard is allowing “cheating”
It’s the same player using different alts. The old, tired rant is the same as always. If ever a thread deserved to be flagged as spam, it’s this thread and others like it.
1 Like