I guess you are wrong because Blizzard removed this feature.
It’s also a used as a metaphor and that definition is even included in dictionaries.
Don’t try and make this some gross moral thing.
According to Merriam-Webster cancer can be defined as:
1 Like
I like flying around gathering. I don’t like competing with one person controlling 5 characters beating me to a node, instantly eliminating my ability to gather from it.
So I have to disagree, dawg.
Signed,
Also Your Average Player
4 Likes
Don’t worry. He was “triggered” because that’s how multiboxers react when called out.
1 Like
You keep using this asinine catch phrase. We can define cheating however we please. All we have to do with the ToS by agreeing is ACKNOWLEDGE BLIZZARD DOESN’T DEEM IT TO BE CHEATING.
Please stop repeating this to yourself in some sort of cognitive dissonance to justify you multiboxing. It is legitimately embarrassing.
5 Likes
Im all for multiboxing, ive done it in other games, its fun BUT, im against it for collecting resources in the open world, pvp or any form of content that ruins the play of other people.
2 Likes
You can make stuff up all day long but that doesn’t make it even slightly valid. You can make up brand new federal laws if you’d like but that doesn’t make it slightly real. If you want to live in a pretend world where you define what you want then by all means, do it.
The irony is palpable. Killer is right, it’s cheating.
Blizzard saying it’s allowed in their game doesn’t make it cheating. If that’s true then if Blizzard said cheating was allowed is it not cheating?
Do you see how dumb it is to try to use that standpoint? I get you have a huge bias being a multi boxer, but come up with a better argument…
3 Likes
I know you want that to make sense but it doesn’t. Cheating is breaking some sort of rule, that’s what cheating means. You can’t come in here and redefine the English language now.
If “cheating” is allowed then it’s not cheating.
I bet you wouldn’t say that if someone just insta killed you as a level 1 with some hack.
The only reason you hold this stance is because you’re on the side with an unfair advantage.
Oh how sweet it would be for Blizzard to change their stance and deem it to be cheating.
Something tells me you wouldn’t be so quick to drop your advantage and say well I guess I was cheating.
3 Likes
Of course I wouldn’t say that, Blizzard doesn’t allow hacks. So yeah, I’d say they were cheating. Are you serious?
No, I’m not. Nothing is stopping you. I have no advantage over you.
This has been a thing since the real vanilla, not happening.
“I, the person with the ability to run multiple accounts simultaneously through third-party software and the cash flow to finance them, don’t have any advantage over you, the person who has neither.”
I think you need to take another look at what you just said. lmao
You, as a multiboxer, do have an advantage over someone who doesn’t multibox. Is it cheating? Not as far as Blizzard is concerned, no. Do you have an advantage? Absolutely. Let’s be real for a moment.
3 Likes
No one has successfully been able to call out multiboxers on this thread.
Says the MULTIBOXER! Ha! Called out.
2 Likes
I assume you are right, they can see everything regarding their game. And it presumably is fine right now, as far as they are concerned. But that doesn’t stop anyone from liking or disliking things they may or may not do. We players do that all the time. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. But saying nothing achieves exactly that - nothing.
I’ve not heard of that, I’d love to see some sources. I’ve heard of botting bans and suspensions but that isn’t economy disruption, that is due to a person doing things that are against the terms of their accounts, the very things we agree to by ticking the “I Agree” box when we start to play.
No they probably wouldn’t. If they are playing with Blizzard’s rules, they aren’t doing anything wrong in Blizzard’s view. The server economies are large, interconnected commercial systems and unless it a very tiny server with few people buying and selling, no one person can control the entire economy. A bit of it maybe, but not the whole thing. If I’m wrong on that, I’d love to see an example.
Thanks for proving my point.
What is this, opposite day?
2 Likes
Quit your multiboxing and speak with me!
Ok boomer.
1 Like
That’s about the most intelligent input I’d expect from you. If you don’t have anything to say it’s usually best to not say anything, you save yourself from looking foolish like this.
1 Like