Because it is a real response. You just don’t like the answer.
I will be as plain as I can be.
My stance on multiboxing is it presents an advantage to players willing to pay more to command a greater amount of power at one time. That is quite literally the definition of pay to win. My suspicion is that people here are ok with this, but are avoiding simply saying so due to the stigma that surrounds pay to win mechanics.
If I am incorrect, and there is not a power advantage in controlling three characters at one time, then all I am looking for is for someone to give me a reason how that is not the case.
Clear enough?
Nor do I. Pathfinder was the solution looking for a problem.
you can dislike anything you like. Im all for free expression.
But you need to stop pretending that your arguments are valid on this one.
Three accounts is three accounts. How many players are behind them isnt relevant
1 Like
Same with you which is why I’m done. You finally saw what I actually said and your rebuttal wasn’t an actual response to what I said, but rather “bAcKpEdaAliNg”. Just shows that you have no valid response to it.
what a hoot.
Its not pay to win, guy.
go play some android games where you pay cash to be able get to the next level, lol
THAT is pay to win.
1 Like
To you. Just like it’s not to me. All personal opinions which in the end are all irrelevant.
I saw what you actually said. You’ve been lying about how the wow token system works and now you’re trying to backpedal about it now that you’ve been caught in your lies.
So yeah, you have nothing constructive to add to this conversation. Your sole and only reason to post here is to stir the pot, so welcome to my ignore list.
W.e you say bud, keep deflecting by not answering. I said the same thing before, you just couldn’t comprehend it.
Proved my point so now I’m a troll and on ignore because you have no rebuttal.
A Blizzard employee once said that multiboxing gives an unfair advantage over a single character but so does partying up and they see no difference between a party played by a single person and a party played by several.
I have to go for a few. My cat just came through the bedroom cat door and is throwing a fit.
1 Like
Because 5 different people benefit from the party vs just 1 person benefiting 5 times.
What kind of power are you talking about here?
1 Like
what matters in all things is the rules laid out by those who make them.
If the speed limit is 65…drive 65 or lower. You dont have to agree with it. Someone smarter than you on the topic made the rules most likely.
Boxing is allowed. I dont really box and certainly dont do it farming, but Im not going to sit here pretending to blame boxers if I cant make enough gold as MOST box haters do in these threads.
If you cant handle the game allowing it, find another game. Exactly what Id do if it were keeping me up at night as its clearly doing to some here.
The Force, obviously 
Let’s say that Shadowlands comes out and my roommate and I get our squad together and we start leveling in Bastion.
We stay away from others and don’t try to pull out from people. We harm absolutely no one.
What business is it of anyone else how we play?
Why can’t people stay in their own lanes?
5 Likes
The avatar to player count is mostly irrelevant when considering how much power a single player should be able to purchase in my opinion. Their response is not scalable. Consider if that party of 5 players was now matched with 5 players multiboxing and controlling 25 characters. In each example we consistently see that the situation lies heavily in favor of the multiboxers.
Power meaning the amount of damage, health, etc and overall effectiveness in the world. I suppose “gatherability” would also be a factor in economically.
I was ganked by two players a couple years ago.
Guess they had an unfair advantage, lol.
I should make a thread screaming about players being able to gang gank other players…one against one or they should be banned lol
Same argument could be used for anything no one likes in the game “Don’t like it go play something else” then the quality of the game wouldn’t improve. People not liking how things in the game are how we got to where we are now. Imagine if they didn’t change anything in the game from the start. Since we’re back to real world analogies, what’s set in law or “rules” doesn’t always make them right, there will be people that agree with it and disagree with it. But saying “it’s allowed, end discussion” isn’t the solution. If it’s truly Ok they won’t change it and you have nothing to worry about.
Trying to punish people like me because of Blizzard’s implimentation of Zin’anthid is kinda silly.
2 Likes
On day one of an expansion’s release? Impossible. There’s going to be players going into every nook and cranny of all the new zones as soon as they possibly can, so eventually, someone’s going to come along and see your squad racking up hundreds or thousands of kills in an infinite spawn area.
And considering your scenario of “staying away from others”, odds are you’re going to be avoiding questing (because normal people tend to quest to level) – which means you wont know if the mobs you’re killing are quest mobs that people might need.
Theres nothing to improve here. Its nothing like buying bot farmed gold for cash.
Three accounts is three accounts is three accounts…and it really is NONE of your business how many players are behind those accounts.
1 Like