I call alliance bias!
More horde than ally.
Yeah and they are complaining that Kul tirans didn't get Paladins while Zandalari did lmao
To be fair I wasnt counting panda shamans before but now thats 5 ally sham options to 3 horde pallies...
Who cares about shamans though.
11/05/2018 01:59 PMPosted by KirokTo be fair I wasnt counting panda shamans before but now thats 5 ally sham options to 3 horde pallies...
Blood Knights, Sunwalkers and whatever the hell they decide to Call Zandalari Light wielders aren't Paladins.
Tidesages are neither Shaman either.
So technically speaking, thats 4 ally Sham, 0 Horde paladin OH NOES!
11/05/2018 02:00 PMPosted by EatitWho cares about shamans though.
I use to they use to be one of my favorite classes but as of now K have no idea lol
If you really want to get into it there are more alliance shamans than horde paladins, but there are also more horde Shamans than Alliance paladins. There are just fewer paladin options in general than shaman it is not about any sort of bias.
Eight Horde shaman choices to only five Alliance paladin options.
Does it matter?
Moar Horrd Shaymin than Allians Pallydans!!!
That's because there's more shaman than paladins period. There's still (at least until Zandalari get paladins) a three race/class combo gap in the favor of the faction that started with the class for each.
11/05/2018 02:02 PMPosted by Tentaclatrix11/05/2018 01:59 PMPosted by KirokTo be fair I wasnt counting panda shamans before but now thats 5 ally sham options to 3 horde pallies...
Blood Knights, Sunwalkers and whatever the hell they decide to Call Zandalari Light wielders aren't Paladins.
Tidesages are neither Shaman either.
So technically speaking, thats 4 ally Sham, 0 Horde paladin OH NOES!
For once, this is not some imbalance based on player decision or lore wich is more often than not a matter of point of view most of the time.
The matter at hand here id real imbalance built in by devs, and not some concequence of implamentation choice!
They ought to let all races have access to all classes.
I can list several good reasons why mag'har, goblins and forsaken should all be able to play paladin.
I can list several good reasons why mag'har, goblins and forsaken should all be able to play paladin.
well if the horde would recruit more races
with cultural heritages that value rule of law and moral absolutism
maybe they could have more paladins
with cultural heritages that value rule of law and moral absolutism
maybe they could have more paladins
11/05/2018 01:50 PMPosted by KirokI call alliance bias!
Don't you have more druids and paladins once ZD trolls are here?
11/05/2018 03:18 PMPosted by Kirela11/05/2018 01:50 PMPosted by KirokI call alliance bias!
Don't you have more druids and paladins once ZD trolls are here?
ZD trolls will be a great addition in regards to tjose options they come with.
I'm more concerned about allies getting 2 new shamans options.
11/05/2018 02:02 PMPosted by Tentaclatrix11/05/2018 01:59 PMPosted by KirokTo be fair I wasnt counting panda shamans before but now thats 5 ally sham options to 3 horde pallies...
Blood Knights, Sunwalkers and whatever the hell they decide to Call Zandalari Light wielders aren't Paladins.
Tidesages are neither Shaman either.
So technically speaking, thats 4 ally Sham, 0 Horde paladin OH NOES!
The classes are general archetypes for there units. For example you can interpret a botanist as a druid if you wanted to (different lore same class abilities).
Its how horde has most paladins. Blood elf rangers and scouts are our rogues and hunters for example.
Alliance also get a title for completing a zone in BfA (Inquisitor). Horde doesn't.
Yet more Alliance bias!
Yet more Alliance bias!
11/05/2018 03:13 PMPosted by Aigeiroswell if the horde would recruit more races
with cultural heritages that value rule of law and moral absolutism
maybe they could have more paladins
Zandalari prove that culture really doesn't matter. All that matters is Blizzard finds it "kewl!"