Calling it now.
Outlaw rogues losing stealth. Pirates fight out in the open, not stab in the back. They take by force, not pick pockets.
Stealth isn’t appropriate for a pirate. It’s all there in the Class Fantasy™.
18 Likes
Stealth actually serves a purpose in outlaw’s current kit.
The pet in MM’s current kit serves no purpose, other than making them really not want to lust.
23 Likes
That’s not actually true, pirates sneak all the time in pirate fantasy.
I can understand the frustration that people have for MM losing pets but there’s still a noticeable gap in class fantasies.
There’s ONE class in the game that uses a ranged weapon, and that class revolves around pets. What if you don’t like pets? There are plenty of reasons to not like pets.
7 Likes
As someone who played a Warlock on Yogg in classic, yes.
4 Likes
I was being facetious.
Facetious topic.
That’s what the ™ represents. The fact that Class Fantasy™ gets thrown around to justify everything.
4 Likes
If you are an outlaw rogue who doesn’t like sneaking then you can just go fury warrior instead for that dual sword experience.
But there isn’t anything for people who want that ranger fantasy.
You know there would be people like that, praising blizz by saying how they always hated stealth on rogues, and they are FINNALLY getting what they want and a lot of bs
Actually false, it does not for M+, but that is not the only content wow have.
18 Likes
And hunters have pet all the time in fantasy.
Lone wolf was there for these people
now they are trying to rob the option for the rest
Except there is, and you dont even need to go into another class, or spec, you can just get one talent
15 Likes
Seeing as how it’s already meta for marksman hunters to not use a pet, I don’t understand why they’re making any change at all.
Not meta to use a pet, but pet there if you want to use it.
That’s perfect imo.
16 Likes
It does, though I unironically don’t think it should.
Harmful to the class fantasy IMO.
Lone Wolf has been a feature of MM for the better part of a decade. You could have at least tried to make a comparison that wasn’t dumb.
7 Likes
The purpose it has in M+ is you pull it out, cast lust, immediately dismiss it, then AFK for 5 seconds before doing damage.
4 Likes
Yeah, i know that, im saying it does have purposes in other content other than this, so your point is false.
2 Likes
What, as a crutch so that unskilled players can clear delves?
It is not required for any world or solo content to be relatively easily completable.
2 Likes
Yes. Which is a sufficient reason alongside mixed feelings on class fantasy.
I seriously don’t get why anyone with an honest view of the changes can look at it and suggest it doesn’t have any problems. How some folks don’t look at it and go “man that’s a weird half-measure.”
2 Likes
That, in PVP, in questing, RP and other solo content.
I guess you are one of the “elite” that think m+ is the the only way to play wow and people don’t do anything else
5 Likes
If you come at everyone like that they’re going to react the way Quiver did. Caps is reasonable.
2 Likes
Perfect is an enemy of good.
The place I’m coming from is that the changes (as they are now) make the spec better than it is now, and the problems with it will be found when the PTR goes live (probably end of this week or early next week).
1 Like
Granted, and a good response, including what I didn’t quote here.
I still feel like the government mandated not-pet bird could have been a stable pet quite easily.
5 Likes
There will be glyphs for that bird, but I don’t think they were in the build that wowhead datamined.
I’ll need to see what they end up being before passing judgement.
2 Likes