Someone hiding on a classic alt doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt. By being on a classic alt at all, it is a tacit admission you are embarrassed by your main.
So, sub 1k, negative win rate, until proven otherwise.
The world may never know. That’s the beauty of the method.
Not really. The world knows, the only people in denial are the classic copers.
All to their own then.
Im not saying i have a problem but warriors arent the immobile melee at all
they’ll be nerfed on september 5th
2 weeks is generally the amount of time blizzard takes to first garner enough data on recent op specs and that’s how long until .7 is.
i don’t doubt they’ll tone down arms and prob fury a bit then. arms needed buffs, but they’re too much.
could you tell me what is too much about the Arms buffs? im sincerely interested in your expert factual opinion.
Is it bladestorm now averaging 14k hits? Execute hitting for more than 30k? or Mortal strike averaging 60-70k per hit throughout a game?
Is it their burst damage CDs being nerfed by ~25%?
Curious minds are wondering.
execute could hit for 200k prior to the buffs lol
deep wounds didnt need a buff, they didnt need to increase both mortal strike and bladestorm the 2nd time
that’s about my biggest concerns really outside of the cloth vs plate disparity which is why warr feels so bad in the first place.
like i said, needed buffs, but went a bit too far for a class that had a place in the meta already.
no it couldnt. if u let a warrior stack up 10 stacks of fatal mark, it could over a 3 min game maybe. Fatal Mark is not an execute, and can be immuned off. its a stacking debuff that adds 8k additional damage to an execute 30% of the time when you MS a target.
Deep wounds ticks for 9k instead of 6k now… ur delusional
It absolutely could not, even with spear build.
Deep wounds also didn’t need a weird nerf it had left over from BFA. Bladestorm? Why on earth are you upset about bladestorm? Complaining about these is so weird, it is like a slam buff, no one cares.
Mortal Strike absolutely needed a buff, it was doing very little.
There’s a pretty big difference between having mobility and having enough mobility to be effective in this meta.
so if you dont open with a gapcloser you dont have enough mobility to stick to your target? Barring mages what classes can you not stick to if you trade properly?
You just admitted even you don’t have issues kiting warriors as a dragon. So you can add that.
But honestly there’s a lot of factors. In a 1v1 with no pillars, sure, staying on a target isn’t that hard.
In an arena, with multiple people using CC, LOS, knockbacks, freedoms, most things can get 8 yards away from us.
Games about trades warrior doesnt need more mobility. Casters should have an equal amount of tools to create distance as melee have gapclosers. Whoever makes the mistake of using it first is at the disadvantage as it should be.
I didn’t realize the entire game was based and balanced around keeping warriors off you.
So casters should lose half their utility then, since there’s 2 of them each game to peel the warrior away.
I like the way you think.
I get like 110k execute crits on cloth rn and i have the spear crit damage execute talents this is post buff, or do you mean fatal mark?
ms needed the buff, i dont think bladestorm did.
keep trolling i dont mind im pretty bored right now
I’m not trolling. I can tell most of the people whining about warrior mobility don’t play the class above 1800 if at all because they have no idea how easy it is to deny warrior mobility.
It’s really easy to stay on a 1600 caster panicking.
It’s much harder to stay on a warlock porting around pillars while a mage roots you mid charge and knocks you back.
Charge and leap don’t have insignificant CDs. Warrior is one of the few classes that actually runs out of mobility, and if half the ranged learned to used their kit, they’d realize that too, especially when you factor in your partners.
Now combine that with the fact that our damage is currently being balanced around high uptime rather than big burst, and you start to see the issue.
Plenty of wars sitting 2400+ proving this statement wrong
“Plenty.”
Count them.