Making deals with the enemy king.
Freed by the enemy King.
oh how far has Saurfang fallen...r.i.p.
Good, Horde needs all the traitors they can get.
Guys. They aren't going to make Sylvanas a Garrosh 2.0.
Calm down.
Doesn't matter if 100% of all evidence points to a Garrosh 2.0. Doesn't matter if every single new thing released points to a Garrosh 2.0.
If it looks like a duck. Quacks like a duck. Flies like a duck. Its probably a squirrel.
Calm down.
Doesn't matter if 100% of all evidence points to a Garrosh 2.0. Doesn't matter if every single new thing released points to a Garrosh 2.0.
If it looks like a duck. Quacks like a duck. Flies like a duck. Its probably a squirrel.
You do not fool me. My Spectral Sight allows me to look past your glamour and see the undead scum that hides behind.
Sylvanas has been a monster for years and she must die like one. Of course, I know she won't; the writers will give her a nauseating "redemption" and turn her into Kerrigan 2.0, because that's technically still going by what they claimed of not having Garrosh 2.0. Technicalities; a lawyer's best friend.
Sylvanas has been a monster for years and she must die like one. Of course, I know she won't; the writers will give her a nauseating "redemption" and turn her into Kerrigan 2.0, because that's technically still going by what they claimed of not having Garrosh 2.0. Technicalities; a lawyer's best friend.
Good riddance to Sylvanas. She has been a cancerous tumor on the honor of the Horde for too long. Paging Doctor Saurfang. Paging Doctor Saurfang. It's operation time.
11/02/2018 01:03 PMPosted by AkstonGuys. They aren't going to make Sylvanas a Garrosh 2.0.
Calm down.
Doesn't matter if 100% of all evidence points to a Garrosh 2.0. Doesn't matter if every single new thing released points to a Garrosh 2.0.
If it looks like a duck. Quacks like a duck. Flies like a duck. Its probably a squirrel.
Players: "Look it has feathers and bill!"
Blizzard: "I don't see it"
Players: "Look at this google image of a duck, now look at the duck. They are identical"
Blizzard: "I really just don't see how you're drawing that comparison"
Players: "A professional biologist classified it as a duck!!!"
Blizzard: "It's clearly not a duck"
...
Blizzard: *Laughing their butts off in the break room*
One could make the argument that it shows that the Horde has betrayed itself.
Dude. Saurfang didn't agree with Sylvanas' war tactics, so he wanted to at least die with honor. That's why he split away from Sylvanas, not the Horde. He still wanted to fight the Alliance, but not Sylvanas' way. She thought Anduin would kill Saurfang. Anduin did not kill him, neither did Saurfang kill Anduin, so today we found out why. Sylvanas is all about destruction and doesn't care about the Horde at all.
So?
He's doing the right thing.
Just like Vol'jin did the right thing seeking alliance help vs Garrosh and the zandalari.
He's doing the right thing.
Just like Vol'jin did the right thing seeking alliance help vs Garrosh and the zandalari.
I don't remember seeing any deals made in that cinematic. I must be blind.
11/02/2018 01:01 PMPosted by LockedheartMaking deals with the enemy king.
Freed by the enemy King.
oh how far has Saurfang fallen...r.i.p.
That King's father once let Saurfang pass to collect the body of his son. Saurfang isn't a traitor to the Horde. He's a savior of the Horde.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
There are no Old Gods in Battle for Azeroth.
ohh look, it's a blood elf saying that their former ranger general, the one who vouched to the horde to allow them entry and sent troops to help with the scourge problem in Ghostlands, needs to die. we got more traitors in our midst.11/02/2018 01:05 PMPosted by MàteusYou do not fool me. My Spectral Sight allows me to look past your glamour and see the undead scum that hides behind.
Sylvanas has been a monster for years and she must die like one. Of course, I know she won't; the writers will give her a nauseating "redemption" and turn her into Kerrigan 2.0, because that's technically still going by what they claimed of not having Garrosh 2.0. Technicalities; a lawyer's best friend.
11/02/2018 01:05 PMPosted by MàteusSylvanas has been a monster for years and she must die like one
casue she didnt save the horde on broken isles...
11/02/2018 01:09 PMPosted by WrizbySylvanas is all about destruction and doesn't care about the Horde at all.
out of every Warchief she has contributed the msot in the shortest amount of time...
11/02/2018 01:10 PMPosted by PronyraJust like Vol'jin did the right thing seeking alliance help vs Garrosh and the zandalari.
Garrosh was fracturign the Horde :| he didnt want a Horde. He wanted an orcish horde. he was enemy of everyone.
Sylvanas actually works to give horde a future.
(and if u go back and read a good war you will see even Saurfang agrees with why she started the war)
11/02/2018 01:10 PMPosted by AyaaniI don't remember seeing any deals made in that cinematic. I must be blind.
anduin let saurfang free to stop sylvanas with him as he cant do it alone.
11/02/2018 01:01 PMPosted by LockedheartMaking deals with the enemy king.
Freed by the enemy King.
oh how far has Saurfang fallen...r.i.p.
the lich king killed his son. he's not a fan of lich or scourge.
cant imagine why anyone would question his motives after watching him grieve his son.
He didn't make any deal with Anduin, Anduin just let the door opened
Its not bad or wrong "to betray" a dead elf who is a genocidal and a maniac, just saying
Its not bad or wrong "to betray" a dead elf who is a genocidal and a maniac, just saying
Would that be the same former ranger general that plagued her own loyal warriors and then raised their undead corpses? Yeah, that's totally what the Horde stands for.11/02/2018 01:12 PMPosted by Nemestrïnusohh look, it's a blood elf saying that their former ranger general, the one who vouched to the horde to allow them entry and sent troops to help with the scourge problem in Ghostlands, needs to die. we got more traitors in our midst.
She only cares about herself. Her people are a distant second, but only if they are blindly loyal. Everyone else is considered useful... until they aren't.
11/02/2018 01:10 PMPosted by PronyraSo?
He's doing the right thing.
Just like Vol'jin did the right thing seeking alliance help vs Garrosh and the zandalari.
The right thing would've been challenging Sylvanas to mak'gora, and murdering her in a blood frenzy similar to how they described thrall entering a blood frenzy in the WoD trailers. They could've shown him a strong Orc trope that doesnt need to rely on the alliance for assistance. Have him cleave his way through Nathanos then have Sylvanas enter a rage and try to kill him but have her fall short and die. Then throw the forsaken into disarray over leadership and questioning their place within the horde. The alliance still believe them to be a part of the horde but theres a large group of rogue forsaken that are stirring up trouble so the Alliance put that blame on the horde and you still get the same conflict that we've had so far. That would've been a newer plotline idea than what we have now. I'm not a professional writer and I'm sure someone has a better idea but the point is that it didn't have to be a regurgitated plotline from MOP.
11/02/2018 01:19 PMPosted by FecklessThe right thing would've been challenging Sylvanas to mak'gora,
Like vol'jin did with Garrosh?
11/02/2018 01:19 PMPosted by Fecklessnd murdering her in a blood frenzy similar to how they described thrall entering a blood frenzy in the WoD trailers.
Like sylvanas, the lich queen, would fight fair and honorable in a horde tradition, lmao
The real traitors are the ones that listen to Sylvanas' orders.