Limited Daily "Likes" on the Forum?

I was just informed that my limit of “liking” forum posts for the day was nearly met.

There is a restriction on this? How does this benefit the forums? To prevent “like” inflation?

I’m genuinely interested in the justification of this. Isn’t it better to spread the love rather than spread the troll/hate that seems to have no bounds here?

Thanks.

2 Likes

There’s no room for positivity on these forums! :stuck_out_tongue:

7 Likes

I didn’t like this post for fear of running out of likes.

sorry bro hamster

1 Like

It’s to make sure we don’t overwork the server hamsters

@Toneloktar good idea, they are a valuable commodity!

Agreed.

White knight Elitists know to spread their hate, but when I see a genuinely good idea, I fear of hitting the limit.

Thats a new one

2 Likes

Not when you’re in my boots.

Pretty much this, anything pro-casual gets shot down by them.

Its new because white knight implies theyre blindly defending something. What do “elitists” defend? And i am on these boards a lot, the only thing i see them disliking is LFR. Most others things are ignored unless they affect their gameplay

1 Like

If it helps any, everything now is character limited, just switch characters, though your post count won’t follow you, nor your trust levels, you will get more likes.

1 Like

I can share some ideas if you want.

Feel free. Its a free forum where as long as you dont break the ToS you are free to share any idea you wont. But people are also free to disagree

So, “likes” are time-gated… shocker.

2 Likes

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/pathfinder-needs-more-options/21388/44

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/there-needs-to-be-account-wide-powers/40663/4

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/im-surprised-theres-no-carry-system-in-game/59360/6

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/2x4s-being-nerfed-why-not-buff-them-instead/70220/2

(Kind of similar to Pathfinder needs more options) Pathfinder Part 2 can still work, but it needs to change - #105 by Feliciti-ysera

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/allow-rio-to-be-a-blizzard-made-score-to-queue-into-hard-content/113316/185

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/dungeons-raids-as-one-merge-difficulties/123317/2

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/why-cant-the-comp-stomp-ai-be-used-in-raids/132659/47

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/it-just-feels-horrible-to-be-elitist-heres-how-to-fix-it/138252/54

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/doubloons-could-use-some-love-too-the-justice-points-to-trs-valor-points/145617/2

And finally:

I don’t think they break the TOS, but let me know.

1 Like

are things like pathfinder considered an elitist topic? after going through many of these it seems our definitions greatly differ. When i think elitist i think of people who look down on others for doing less than them and think that only their opinions matter more because they take part in the most difficult content

It seems your definition is people who disagree with you. Almost none of those come across as people being elitist

1 Like

No, I’m a casual.

The threads are pro-casual. The problem is once they disagree with me, they resort to name calling.

1 Like

Im a casual too. People disagreeing with me isnt elitist. The threads also arent “pro-casual” since im pretty sure many people who are “casual” (whatever this means) probably dont agree with you on those topics too

Basically, I want WoW to do more with less RNG.

Like keep the current RNG, but add more player agency, which the game severely lacks.

You are going to find that many people, even those who do high end content agree with this sentiment. Less rng is pretty well accepted topic across most playstyles

2 Likes

That’s news to me. Now i’m curious. How many likes have you given out today and what’s the like cap?