A bit of a weird OP, but here goes:
The Void represents complete lack of being, and therefore, unadulterated potency/potentiality. In WoW, it’s often represented as a powerful catalyst for change. This change is typically either “corruption” in people, places, things, or entropy (Entropius the void god, the void elf ability “entropic embrace”, etc…)
The Light, on the other hand, undergirds extant things, and preserves them from deteriorating. This is seen in spells like PW:S, Fortitude, healing spells, etc.
Also, apparently, the universe/Great Dark Beyond relies on both correlative forces to exist. The Light is a force which keeps extant things existing, as they are, the Void facilitates change, entropy, and annihilation. Only with the two together, can you have a varied, changing universe.
Now here’s where things get interesting… nobody in their right mind would desire unadulterated Void, because that would entail their own annihilation. This is well-demonstrated in lore because void servants are typically mad. Okay, makes sense. SIMILARLY, nobody in their right mind would desire unadulterated Light. Why? Because that would entail their own complete subsumption by it. If the Void is non-being, then when it’s gone, all that’s left is Being, with a capital “B.” As in the reeeally old days, when it was just the Light, chilling out, doing its thing, before the Void came along. Pockets of void allow singular things, differentiated things, (* cough *, mortal things.) Without Void, you’ve got * just *the Light.
Still with me?
The only thing that would make the Light worthy of worship (and not just respect/reverence as a helpful force) is if it were more than just a force for healing and preservation. It would need not only to represent actus purus (unadulterated act of being), but also summum bonum, that is, the highest good. And by highest “good”, I’m not talking about the RPG alignment, I’m talking about truth itself, beauty itself, and goodness itself… the things any sane/and logical mind can’t help but want realized.
It seems to me that this is NOT how the Light is represented, however. Yes, it is portrayed benevolently in a general and often vague fashion, but it greatly falls short of making one be cool with a Light-and-Light-Alone existence
So unless the story changes again… for the time being, it strikes me that, at best, adherents of the Light should regard it with cautious reverence and appreciation, but certainly not fanatic worship. After all, if it truly is a dualistic principle - no one should desire it on its own, for its own sake.
No?
