I’ve seen one of like five that matches this description.
Whatever, we both know where you’re taking this. Clearly looking to argue out of emotion instead of using logic.
Yeah, and sadly this fake accusation of elitism to this group of people is making my opinion lean toward the opposite argument.
Kinda makes sense now that you mention it. I always see the first replies to logical anti-lfr threads so full of emotion and lack of argument. Like their feelings take place before the quality of gameplay? Weird.
And thats cool man…because blizzard is in this for the $$$.
Theyre going to follow those $$$ wherever they lead…and it wont be in the direction that 8 players on this forum are incessantly whining about while attacking players for running LFR while they themselves are reeking of LFR play.
oh please
Lack of comprehension on your part does not indicate failure on our part.
huh…yep…just as I thought…TONS of LFR play in the profile.
Next…
sorry but as I said…I HAVE BEEN HERE reading.
Just ask your buddies about that.
If you say it aint there youre either lying or you havent been reading…like at all.
Then why go out on a limb to attempt to prove me wrong? When you proved me right.
Only to show me right again with another attacking post by selecting only portions to skew the narrative in attempts to favor your argument without viewing it in its entirety.
Showing how deceitful you actually are even to attempt to attack me again with your recent post.
I highlighted your behavior and you took offense to it. You wanted to play victim after the attack and I pointed it out.
You called me the dictator when I proved you wrong and showed how you’re actually dictating how others should be forced to play with you when they don’t want QoL servers, and what did you type “then go play classic”.
These servers wouldn’t harm retail or classic and only benefit both by allowing classic to stay classic and Retail to remain retail. Tbc is already in demand and so is wrath. Having focus on them would harm the game overall.
You say I’m trolling but I’m actually Putting the idea of something out that would benefit the game overall
By keeping a cohesive focus on the main game.
I mean sure I don’t mind opinions but you’re throwing rocks and attempting to hid your hand as if you didn’t. Go
I raid heroic ep and i have never even joined a guild or done any raids that are raids from my server. You should try out the lfg tool… like 10 heroic groups going at any time.
Dead servers are a bad excuse for not doing normal and heroic.
The biggest problem is that LFR was based on a lie from the start. Ion says that only 1% got to see KT in Naxx, but I’d be curious to see how many saw Illidan and/or KJ in TBC, and how many saw LK in WotLK, I’m willing to bet that percentage went up.
They had set the bar so to speak with what they were capable of without LFR, so when they institute LFR and say it will lead to more raid content it should have worked off of that particular bar they had already set.
I dont really care that LFR is in the game, my problem is that we were told it would allow them to provide more raid content and instead, their doing less raids and less encounters and just doing different difficulty levels and calling it content.
TBC had 9 raids with 52 bosses total, WotLK had 9 raids and 56 bosses, WoD had 3 raids with 30 bosses total, Legion had 5 raids with 30 bosses total as well, now in BFA we’re currently at 4 raids with 32 bosses (give or take with the way BoD was set up for factions). Granted we dont have the numbers for the final BfA raid but as of right now, the old pre-LFR raids had more content.
In my own opinion adding extra difficulties to the same raids while cutting back on the number of raids and encounters isn’t giving us more content like Ion claimed. At the end of the day its the same raids and same bosses just with a more health, damage, and maybe a few extra mechanics, the story and art of the raid is still the same.
Even MoP that he references still only had 5 raids and 43 bosses, which yes is a large number of encounters but still less than what we had before and its starting to seem like a downward trend as far as the number of encounters go over time.
So now the issue is progress?
Groups clear the entire raid in less than 2 hours.
I think you can do a lot with an hour, but it really all depends on the individual.
If the argument is " I can’t clear the raid fast enough", I see you as the comical one.
Why do some people think designing the game around a modicum of player agency and awareness is “elisist design”? Why on earth is it considered “elitist” to expect players to at least bother to figure out the very basics of their classes?.
Why do the same people talk about “casuals” as if they are mentally impaired people who need everything spoonfed? (no offense to those with actual disabilities).
Wrath was far from “elitist design”, wrath had arguably the most engaging and rewarding gameplay, if you played better the difference in performance was massive, the classes weren’t designed for everyone and their grandma to perform at similar levels. WoD flopped because there was nothing to do, not because it was “elitist”.
I heard stories about just how bizarre GD forums can get but this feels like watching those crazy feminist convention videos on youtube.
You just made an oxymoron with this sentence. Not surprising since you earlier resorted to a non sequitur with the quip about people liking to run over and kill people in cars.
You don’t even have the skills to handle basic debate. You aren’t even aware of your own lack of skills which is even worse.
and quite honestly, I think some of them think they are better at the the game than they are.
Why does it always feel like they are projecting when theyre bashing LFR players?
Like maybe THEY got rejected by REAL raiders and come in here to try to build up that broken self esteem by trashing others.
I play every class in this game. Im pretty good at figuring pretty much everything out.
I dont WANT to play with you all because of your attitudes like we continually see in HERE. Many of us feel exactly the same way. see how simple that was?
