why ban all win traders? because win trading will become the meta
I mean you literally donât understand that thereâs no need for win trading clauses if cheating catches anyone who does anything nefarious with it?
the fact youâre pretending you donât understand that is just embarrassing.
ONe more timeâŚ
Why? why is this bannable if it doesnt create an unfair advantage?
You are still not answering the question.
(what does the meta have to do with ANYTHING)
just stop dude. i understand youre frustrated but stop with the snide remarks.
because its win trading. you want me to tell you these guys are gaining an unfair advantage? fair and unfair are subjective.
Puts on Tin Foil Hat.
What if this is all just a ploy to get more views, on OPâs video? ![]()
Y I K E S
ITT: man gets proven wrong, just starts trying to be cool.
Hereâs a spoiler for you mate, itâs not gonna work everyone can see youâve got nothing left between your ears, itâs been done. Youâre cooked and everyone knows youâre making invalid arguments.
you havent proven anything other than how immature your responses can be
This is a cop out.
But, if you want to use that argument. So is cheating. If fair and unfair is subjective then so is whether or not pool parties should be allowed. Blizzard thinks they should (for now). Blizzard is the authority on the subjectâŚsoâŚit is allowed. pretty simple.
factually incorrect. cheating is clearly defined by outside sources, whereas fair and unfair are entirely based on an individuals perception
I mean you could quote which part of the EULA mentions win trading since youâre so certain itâs against the agreement.
or you could admit you came in here with bad info and that what youâve stated âcollusion and win trading are against TOSâ are blatantly wrong.
Iâm done trying to argue with you youâre obviously just here to screech and hope that the vocal minority that youâre definitely not a part of comes to back you up amiright?
cheating is defined as gaining an unfair advantage if unfair is not defined neither is cheating, R U OK?
Iâm done trying to argue with you youâre obviously just here to screech and hope that the vocal minority that youâre definitely not a part of comes to back you up amiright?
good because im not interested in reading more of what you have to say about how i havent jumped through enough hoops for you to be satisfied
factually incorrect. cheating is clearly defined by outside sources,
âŚ
UmmmmmâŚNo its not andâŚno its not. the definition of what cheating is in the EULA is a literally a couple sentences long. you canât really be more vagueâŚ
No its not
ok so youre wrong. basically cheating can be cited whereas you cant force your opinion of whats fair and unfair on someone esle
good because im not interested in reading more of what you have to say about how i havent jumped through enough hoops for you to be satisfied.
You never really engage in actual dialogue, anyway. You just want to spread your jargon and expect others to follow suit.
You never really engage in actual dialogue, anyway. You just want to spread your jargon and expect others to follow suit
it would be beneficial for most players to agree with me, unless those players like to be wrong
This is a pretty wild thread. An absolute thrill ride with a gripping tale and sends me on an emotional roller coaster. I wonder how this story will end 
cheating is defined as gaining an unfair advantage if unfair is not defined neither is cheating
lets go ahead and stop trying to change the subject. these dudes were win trading on video
it would be beneficial for most players to agree with me, unless those players like to be wrong
Again, just because you say it, doesnât make it true. Iâd be more than willing to have an actual conversation where thereâs clear grounds in what things mean, so I can follow your train of thought.