Layer switching is the problem, not layering itself

Why wait until there is a problem every time? Could have had a 2 hour cooldown from the start. Especially when people said it was going to be abused out the booty

#MyClassic

2 hour cooldown from the start would likely not have helped as much with lag as layering did, however it probably should have been implemented pretty soon.

Conspiracies can be a very real thing and there is nothing wrong with theorizing about them, the thing is Blizzard has been open, and unlike politicians, I don’t see any reason for them to lie about it.

1 Like

hahaha

/tier

Okay, maybe it won’t calm the hysteria, lol.

But don’t worry, I brought enough poporn for everyone! :sweat_smile:

Don’t believe they are lying at all, though I am quite confused about them claiming /who doesn’t show layer specific results. However, still very much think something about this needs to be done before opening the newer servers to transfers.

Well there it is boys and girls. The word of God in Blizzard.

Quit spinning up conspiracy theories. Its funny and sad @ the sametime.

1 Like

I’m betting with this guy. That’s a pretty safe bet! :joy:

1 Like

could be. i just remember chests being involved

Clearly shows that the classic elitist community clearly has no idea what they are talking about and will cling to anything that they can use as a platform to further their private agenda to get EVERYONE to play classic the way they think it should be played.

Welcome to Classic! The forums have always been like this, it’s funny, sad and pathetic all in one. I love it like a train wreck.

1 Like

THANK YOU FOR THE RESPONSE!!!

That settles it: layers are a more practical solution in the short run to opening new servers, and the use of layering is essentially sanctioned and recognized, within reason.

The remainder of what Paz provides is reassurance, which, personally I’m reassured.

However, I was hoping for some form of trajectory when we get rid of layers altogether. It is also interesting to hear confirmation that the layers are in the single digits, although, it seems they can adjust those caps anyway, so we have no real sense on how close we are in thinning population out over additional servers with transfers, as a logical precursor to removing layers in lieu of opening up more servers.

What?

Who anything about a banwave? WTF are you even talking about?

I don’t think labeling people as elitists for not wanting a very obviously flawed system is wise, I am quite a casual player though I grew up with this game, and simply don’t want to see major exploitation of it.

Thank you for responding and clarifying how you’re monitoring this. I’m happy the claims aren’t as large as they were said to be.

Players are out in the world questing or in dungeons? Remember that there is no auto teleport to dungeon so fewer people are sitting afk in cities.

1 Like

Compare the amount of people you see in trade chat to the amount of people you see in cities.

Who would make such outlandish claims like this? Horrible…horrible internet people!

1 Like

No. Layering needs to be gone now

3 Likes

People like you are the problem. You blindly follow and believe EVERYTHING blizzard tells you. How sad