Kinetic energy and cooking a chicken

Community General Discussion
21

dued just use teh micorwave

1 Like
22

I fixed that for you. Don’t type while consuming cooking wines.

23

i fixed thta 4u

2 Likes
24

(backs away from the angry drunken orc slowly)

Back to the CHICKEN!!

25

I’m afraid you have not taken into account a number of factors. First, at what rate will you be slapping your chicken? How many slaps per second? That’s important because your chicken will radiate thermal energy at a particular rate as you’re slapping it. And that rate is determined by what your chicken is made out of and what shape and size it is. And what is the ambient temperature of your chicken? If your chicken is frozen it’s going to need a whole lot more slapping.

So just slapping your chicken into a tasty meal is a little more complicated than you might think.

1 Like
26

If having the skills of making a basic good writing converts you a snob, then what kind of person would be someone like Shakespeare?

1 Like
27

ITS NOT ABUOT HOW GOOD SUM1 WRIGHTS ITS ABOUT ATITUED
im doen w this

28

Wait don’t go I was going to slap some espresso.

29

I thought this was a boomie thread.

Don’t go slapping my chicken gnome


I’ll cook you with the power of disco.

30

Sorry, but i can’t understand you because your writing. It’s orc language what are you using? That would explain a lot.

31

Wouldn’t this result in a chicken paste? It isn’t going to be pretty.

1 Like
32

Mmmmmmmm tender slapped chicken.

33

The energy would be applied to the all the mass that’s involved in the interaction. The error is not accounting for how much energy will be lost cooking whatever the chicken hits.

34

Silly gnomes, just because kinetic energy can release excess as heat, doesn’t mean that it’s going directly into a chicken! Nor is it continuous enough to cook it
or even cook the whole thing

2 Likes
35

Well no, heat (thermal energy) IS kinetic energy, that is the random movement of the particles that constitute the chicken. So if the OP slapped his chicken at a particular rate that was evenly distributed over the surface area of the chicken, it should in fact “heat up” in a uniform fashion.

But still even more assumptions need to be made - you have to assume all slaps are perfectly inelastic collisions where all the kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy. You have to assume the chicken’s size and shape will not be affected by the slapping. That chicken is just going to have to sit there and take a good slapping without falling to pieces.

2 Likes
36

Copy and paste post. Nothing to see here.

37

Are you absolutely sure, Mr. Nice Orc?

38

Some of that 0.0089 degrees would dissipate before the next slap landed, though.

39

Nothing in school taught me anything as interesting as what the OP just taught me.

2 Likes
40

Well I don’t know about chickens, but I’ve slapped my monkey way more than 23,034 times, and it seems to have stayed the same temperature.

1 Like