1-9 Low Keys
10-17 Mid Keys
18- 20 and up High Keys
If people say anything below 20 is a low key, then 20 has to be mid cause you cant just act like there isnt a middle ground people. The 19 other levels, still exist and many of them are way harder than a 9.
I will do a tiny correction and say 17-20 is the high key range simply because thats when hero gear starts dropping aside from that though agree 100%
10 to 17 is a very big jump. i’d break into low-mid and upper-mid…
upper Middlekey.
Eh 17 is definitely high key territory but everyone makes their decisions on whats low and whats high in different ways
19 is low if you’re doing 25s, that’s why these terms are meaningless
20 is a high for gearing, low key to people that push. Reason we sell 20s because they very easy to 4 man
I’m more 1-14 low keys, 15-18 mid keys, 19-22 high keys, 23-24 ultra high keys, 25+ extreme keys.
No its not. That doesnt even make sense. Its not subjective. An entire community of players participate in mythic plus. The .2% dont get to dictate what the other 99.8% are doing.
correct, 20 is not “high”
lol pretty much, but gl op
The 60% that are mythic plus tourists don’t dictate the mythic plus community.
The state of Hawai’i has a population of 1.4M people, yet 10M+ people visited in 2019, not a single visitor was considered a resident or got a vote.
With all due respect, imho this is a bad analogy.
Only if you think people who do 1 key a week should be considered the “m+ community”. He literally said 0.2% shouldn’t dictate what the others do. The residents of Hawai’i literally do that for every visitor.
I understand where you’re coming from, I do, but the analogy you gave wasn’t “up to snuff” imho.
And do you really think there are players who actually do 1 key a week?
Of course there are. Is this in dispute? There are people on the leaderboards who’ve completed 1 key total. They are counted as part of the 100%.
I’m not disputing it, I’m just surprised it’s actually a thing because doing 1 key a week honestly doesn’t accomplish anything for the player. I personally think it’s a waste myself, but who am I to judge someone’s playstyle?
That being said, I would say yes, they do count toward the argument. ALL data should be considered in determining this subject, although this subject is, ahem, highly subjective at best (heh, see what I did there?).
As a matter a fact they are considered the m+ community casual players exist and to pretend they dont is just stubborn
Eh you cant really say a 20 is low consider the numbers only 6% of the m+ community can do 20s or higher.
I think a way to explain is the inferno in osrs its considered the hardest challenge in the game and is so hard that many people cheat to complete it. Despite the fact that some people beat it it is still considered the hardest challenge in the game.
What im trying to say you cant judge for everyone what is high and low by what you can do you have to judge by what the entire community does and if only 6% of the community can do 20s thats a high key
Casual players don’t play the game, casual players use the game to fill their whatever meager time they choose to spend and then complain they just don’t get treated like the “special” hardcore players. There’s a difference.
Well you cant just say casual players dont count just because they dont play as much as you or me the fact is they exist and they shouldnt be ignored because they are still players of this game.