Just give both sides what we want

Assuming server hardware’s cheap, why don’t we just compromise with each other.

People who want endless boosting and end game farming can have their servers and people who wants there to be a penalty for high levels helping out lowbies through less XP and having a instance cap can have our servers.

It would be a great way for both sides to band together and we all walk away getting what we want.

3 Likes

Waiting for the US to follow this logic is about as likely as this happening lol

Just a anti-booster offering compromise is all. Hopefully people aren’t so spiteful the people on the pro-boosting side will do the same.

I like this idea…RP servers would be on the no boosting side, I presume? Makes sense

Maybe. I guess it depends on how Blizzard can expend resources.

It’s not going to happen, but I still like the idea :slight_smile:

It’s just up to people not being spiteful and only wanting things to be one specific way. I’m fully willing to compromise!

Deviate Delight doesn’t have a huge booster problem, but Grob without boosters would be a much better place!

1 Like

I like this idea! I don’t like being lumped in with boosters, but if that’s what it takes to get rid of the 30-per-day cap I’m all for it.

1 Like

Fresh servers with #nochanges (and no transfer)

FRESH

yes please a server without instance flation

Ppl from both sides of this argument are not being truthful on why they are lumphurt.

I’d like this. Would transfers between the server types be allowed?

Ppl from both sides of this argument are not being truthful on why they are lumphurt.

Except both sides (so far?) agree with OP.