Ok, First of, I barely level that warrior 2 weeks ago, and I'd love to know what's going on.
Is it real that fury is better in 2's compared to arms or it's totaly fake?
Thank you all.
.................that would scare you shell less.
1 Like
Both have pros and cons. You would want d-stance against bursty double deeps like spicy mage/assa rogue unless you're rollin with a gosu healer.
I wouldn't touch Arms in 2's unless you have a good/great partner (whos decent at off-heals etc). If you run Arms all the other team have to do is focus you or your teammate and its gg. Arms has nice dmg but games arent won by just dmg and dmg is its main thing. Fury is the way safer pick for 2's.
11/04/2018 02:32 PMPosted by VolysraIf you run Arms all the other team have to do is focus you or your teammate and its gg.
So like...do they have a 3rd option then?
I mean I guess they could just choose not to focus anyone...
Anyway Arms and Fury are pretty close in 2s, with Fury being slightly better probably. However I think it's mostly whatever you're more geared for and comfortable with. I seem to have more success as Arms in 2s. It also sorta depends what healer you're with too.
Off healing is strong in 2's so a lot of hybrid classes or strong healing DPS reign supreme. Which leaves Arms something with no heals in trouble vs the strong Dps/hybrids. You also will get facerolled as Arms more against the Hpaly/Fire Mage of the world with no way to quickly bloodthirst HP back.
So Fury has the burst and healing needed currently in the 2's Meta.
So Fury has the burst and healing needed currently in the 2's Meta.
I'm a filthy casual, but I think it comes down to arms being much more healer dependent. Fury can get by better with off heals or no heals at all.
1 Like