Great reddit response to the question of MMOs being a skinner box. Not mine but I thought that GD could benefit from it.
Depends how you mean it.
Using the term Skinner box as a prejorative is wishful thinking. The best game in the world could be a Skinner box when you boil it down to its fundamentals; it doesn’t really mean anything. If you’re using the term purely analytically to describe the gameplay loop, that’s fine, but if you’re trying to imply anything negative from it, then you’re going to need to explain further. So many people call something a Skinner box because they think it’s a smart way of saying that the game is insubstantial but basically just tricks you into continuing playing, but those claims require justification and don’t follow automatically from something having Skinner-box-like mechanics. At its core, the Skinner box is a learning paradigm, not some inherently manipulative (in the negative sense) psychological ploy.
Likeswise, saying that MMOs “use conditioning” to keep you playing “long after you’ve stopped having fun” is kind of a leap—they’re not intending you to lose interest in the first place. They know their reward structure keeps people playing longer, but as far as they’re concerned that’s because their players are still engaged. It’s awfully presumptuous to assert that these players aren’t having fun anymore, and that they’re just conditioned . Skinner box or not, there’s nothing wrong with a game becoming something comfortable that you just do .
When someone becomes disillusioned with a game or genre, they mistakenly feel like their eyes have suddenly opened and they want to spread their enlightenment with the world. They suddenly feel like anyone who disagrees just hasn’t realized the truth yet. But they’re not enlightened—their preferences just changed, and they’re narrowminded to think no one else can truly be having fun just because they themselves aren’t anymore. These are the people invoking the Skinner box description most often, and I really wish they’d get more creative with their criticisms.