Which has what to do with me exactly? Nothing. Hence you didnt actually explain anything. You made a troll post. Followed up by making another troll post.
Hello?
3 Likes
Are you dense?
I specifically responded to you talking about the population and gave you the reason why the population is lowâŚ
Because the game is too hard for them⌠classic players donât like having the ProgâŚ
Itâs going to be the same thing in Mop.
Literally no one was specifically talking about you unless youâre part of the people who quit
2 Likes
This is true to some degree, but at the same time many people would never play retail ever, but 100% play Classic or Cata and if those were not around they wouldnât be playing WoW at all beside maybe on p-servers.
Iâm one of those people if Cata wasnât there I wouldnât even be playing WoW, I lost interest in retail since Shadowland due to how much of a let down it was after BFA which also was EHHâŚ
1 Like
Not dense, but blonde. Same difference. Happy Cataâing, and Nightslayering.
1 Like
As raids get harder and harder people drop off because they canât do it.
They donât wanna prog and earn the kills they want it nerfed and handed to them.
Mop is regarded as a good xpac but even it will have a low pop because of the raid difficulty.
My raid is currently 6/7 Heroic and we are making it to last phase of Heroic Rag now, I assume he died next week.
1 Like
Still donât need 4 different versions of the same game. Two would suffice.
1 Like
I say it should be three max.
1: Retail
2: Vanilla/Classic (Since its cool to go back to the bare bone version of WoW sometime.)
3: Whatever is the current Progressive Classic Expansion (WOTLK/CATA/MOP)
But now we have
Retail
Classic
Cata
Classic Hardcore
SoD
(And soon.)
Fresh Classic and then TBC again.
Fresh Hardcore Classic.
So many. lol
If they gonna add that many version of WoW I would prefer to see stuff like.
Retail
Legion
MoP
Cata
WOTLK
TBC
Classic
A Permanent server for each Good/decent expansions of WoW.
Until Shadowlands is up next you mean*
I wont play MoP Classic. They should launch it as same exact version MoP Remix was. And anyone who played MoP Remix is not going to want to play MoP Classic. You all want to know what happened to the original Mop? The expansion was so bad that it was the first expac to lose subs all the way through up until they began to hide sub numbers out of embarrassment. Cata dropped most of the way through but not near as much as MoP did.
Releasing a MoP Classic would be a very terrible idea. It would likely lose them lots of money. Servers cost money to run.
They didnât hide the numbers during MoP. The stopped releasing sub numbers in the first half of WoD. MoP dropped to 7.5 million in the first 6 months and stayed around that number for the rest of the expansion.
https://www.techspot.com/news/61642-world-warcraft-loses-another-15-million-subscribers-ahead.html
2 Likes
Youâre aware they stopped releasing sub numbers multiple times in their history as a company right? The first time they did this was in 2010, during Wrath.
I played MoP over a decade ago.
I played MoP remix and collected all the rewards.
I WILL be playing MoP Classic, primarily to collect the CM sets I neglected to collect over a decade ago.
2 Likes
No, they didnât. Blizzard released numbers at irregular intervals. Sometimes every month, other times several months apart. If they released numbers every month for 3 months than didnât release again for 3 or 5 or 7 months it didnât mean they stopped. As for MoP which you claimed was when they stopped releasing numbers, during MoP they consistently released sub numbers every 3 months with their quarterly report for the whole expansion. What ever distorted and convoluted thinking youâre using to erroneously claim blizzard stopped releasing numbers multiple times didnât happen during MoP.
2 Likes
Id do that if it meant unlocking it on live. If I canât, itâs worthless to me.
Itâs not a mystery when they stopped releasing official sub numbers. It was during WoD after they lost half their subs in a year.
âŚwhich I see you already pointed out as I scroll up.
1 Like
Yeah, itâs not, but some of the Cata and MoP haters keep trying to claim it happened during Cata or MoP. I occasionally correct them and point out the obvious. It happened during WoD.
1 Like
Yea they did actually. Blizzard has stopped releasing sub numbers multiple times. Then they start up again. First time they did this was in Wrath, in 2010. Then they started up again, then they stopped.
You canât be serious?
Go Google what I said and stop going out of your way to troll me and other people here. Yea Iâm serious. Not my fault you are incapable of being able to open up a tab and look up what I said.
You two just come to the forums for the sole purpose of trying to start argument with people, it is very obvious that Fey is mad about how bad they are doing in Cata, they have next to no progress done in it, cant even get to level 85 and you on your mage still cant get to 60âŚbeen out long enough for you to have done so.
If youâre counting the first time they stopped releasing sub numbers every month they took a 3 month break in late vanilla. Then for about a year they continued to release numbers monthly until mid BC when they took a 3 month break. In late BC they took a 7 month break. That was the longest time they didnât release sub numbers until they stopped in WoD. So if youâre counting 3 month breaks as stopping that happened many times starting in vanilla. If youâre counting 7 month breaks as stopping the first time that happened was in BC. By what ever stupid and ridiculous standard youâre using the first time they âstoppedâ wasnât in Wrath.