never have tried 3’s and 2’s is just not doing it for me? Thinking of trying out 3’s but if its going to be harder than 2’s I don’t want to waste time on it.
I know with 3’s comes more comms but just starting out shouldnt be that hard
In my experience 2’s has always been easier. I’ve gotten up to 2250 or so in 2s, and can’t even push 1700 in 3s. It’s a different game almost. (one that I’m apparently bad at).
I also think it depends on the class as well – like boomies probably do better in 3s. pally is probably pretty strong in both brackets right now.
Comes down to how you play. From a general PoV, 2s is probably easier since it requires less comms. 2s is also easier for melee (again just my opinion). Caster comps normally succeed much more in 3s
3s requires having two equally good partners
2s requires one
You can do the math 
2s is a lot easier depending on what you play.
2s is easier. If you’re going after the glad title/mount you will have to run 3s
You have to be awake for arenas, it’s not like pve content
oh 3’s is mandatory for the mount? cause thats the main thing im wanting
If you want the winged flying mount, then yes. If it’s the spider mount you can get that from 2s.
3s requires fotm. 2s requires not facing ww. Or bringing your own ww.
I would recommend waiting on 3s. Especially for tuning. But if you are playing ret or hpal you may be able to get through 3s with some op comps.
1 Like
I saw where ret/hunter/healer would be a pretty good comp
1 Like
Cupid works well. If you’re Ret, you can do Ret/Arms Warrior as well for some good queues.
2s isn’t inflated like 3s is right now. 2100+ you are facing r1s. Once 2s get more inflation, it’s pretty easy to push 2400.
depends on if u lfg or not, if u have a main team 3s is easier if lfg 2s is easier
easier to find one good player instead of 2
3’s tops out about 400 rating higher than 2’s top, so it’s likely easier in 3v3 (for now).