Okay, wait all you want. You gonna dismiss the victims until then?
They’re listerally saying sorry for what they did. How are they still innocent at this point?
Why are people this stupid?
Okay, wait all you want. You gonna dismiss the victims until then?
They’re listerally saying sorry for what they did. How are they still innocent at this point?
Why are people this stupid?
Roughly 1/4 can be interrogated into a false confession.
They did so been literally comfirmed by multiple employees
In the future, time cops will arrest you for crimes you may or may not commit
And multiple employees confirmed they didn’t.
This causing such great pain coming from you.
I tried so hard to impress you and I’ve failed. Guess I’ll just walk away and call it a day.
I feel like a lot of these people need to move someplace like Cuba, North Korea or China where they don’t have to worry about the presumption of innocence.
Then you can be a nice little authoritarian and ruin peoples lives by mob rule.
Google can already predict my death. Maybe it can predict my innocence
I didn’t say they were innocent did I?
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2015/07-08/upfront-crimes#:~:text=Comment%3A,rights%20group%20The%20Innocence%20Project.
https://www.livescience.com/why-people-fasely-confess-to-crimes.html
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/06/psychologist-explains-why-people-confess-crimes-they-didn-t-commit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_confession
Lmao, dude you keep saying ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ and ‘interrogated into a false confession’… Do you know what civil court is?
This situation is really shttie and they really need to fire everyone at the top.
There are two very different concepts that people cannot seem to grasp these days. One is that “free speech” as granted to you by the US Constitution, applies ONLY to the government not being able to take legal action against you for your opinions. This has been twisted to mean “if anyone claps back at me, they are violating my rights under the first amendment”. The other is that “innocent until proven guilty” applies to being put on trial in a court of law, not what the public at large are allowed to THINK about a case or situation based on available information. This has apparently been twisted to mean “anyone who comments about any pending legal action before a jury verdict is rendered is undermining the legal system”. These arguments are mostly put forward by people who enjoy having no consequences for anything they do or say.
No, I would not want to deprive you of your only social interaction of the week, you may stay
Only in this day and age, the age of twitter, would “innocent until proven guilty” be considered a hot take. That’s literally the foundation of our justice system you insufferable assclown.
ROFLMAO…
So the WoW community is down to… They were forced into confessing.
LMFAO!!!
My stomach is in pain from laughing so hard. You guys are hilarious, please keep going.
Well at least we know you are prone to exaggeration. No one is yelling in anyone’s face you idiot… People are just allowing the legal system to do it’s job. If it was left up to people like you the Duke lacross team would be sitting in jail right now for a rape that was never even committed.
I’d say yes…it’s easy to not play a game that you don’t play anyhow…so it’s really not much of a sacrifice and is in fact simply virtue signaling.
If you for example say, screw this I quit. It has a much greater impact as you probably have thousands of hours played. Your time invested is much greater.
It’s akin to me boycotting apple products…I don’t own any apple products anyhow.
wegotusarealbadarseoverhere.gif
The point of it is to determine if the crime actually took place–and figuring out who actually did it–before delivering punishment. Otherwise, you run the risk of punishing innocents–which is something that has happened more than is comfortable to admit in human history.
The logical thing to do is to be sympathetic and kind to the alleged victims whilst being critical of the supposed crimes until there is sufficient evidence against the apparent perpetrator. That evidence can be any number of things.