Incremental deserter debuff for those who never finish a game

PVP Battlegrounds
21

You’re speculating what you perceive as most likely. I am doing the same with different words, and my speculation is just as implied as yours. What cha got next?

22

There is more to come, day 3 and players are pining for static deserter buffs.
This isn’t 120 either.

23

You are claiming what happened with certainty. I am saying what I think happened.

If you can’t see the difference, I can’t help you further.
You may wish to brush up on the language though.

Citation needed.

24

My nose is always right.

25

They should be, but why are there so many threads made after the queue separation complaining about xp-on twinks?

26

Do you need to google the definition of ‘implied’?

27

“I think this happened”
“No, this happened”.

28

Can you blame them? Their core content is gone. Now for those who ‘twink’ to genuinely crush levelers will recycle op specs in low level brackets and cause a much bigger issue. Those who twinked for the community and a change from the excuse for an end game now have no option but to voice their displeasure with this change. Bad pvpers who for some reason subject themselves to low level pvp will still cry on the regular

1 Like
29

I’ll ask again, do you know what implied means? You’re just being nit-picky over sentence structure because you don’t have much left.

30

I said what I think happened based on what’s likely, you claimed what happened.
There wasn’t “much left” from your first reply, since you’re claiming things happened with nothing to back it up.

That’s where I’ll leave this.

31

Just read any post of this forum that isnt in pretty blue text as an assumption/guesstimation/opinion because Blizzard doesnt make the information necessary to validate any of it public. Ive seen your name on the forums for a while now, this should be a lesson you already learned. But, Im glad I was able to teach you today, so you can move forward and not make the same mistakes again.

1 Like
32

And twinks are restricted to the 19s bracket? since they merged the queues and removed the stat templates kindaofthing twinks swarmed ALL brackets.
“if you just kill some wolves in the woods and do some random dungeons you should be to 60 in honestly 1 day” and should only see different twink characters for each and EVERY bracket. twinks made RBG while leveling (as it’s supposed to be) unbearable on all levels until max for those wanting another way of gaining xp.

1 Like
33

Saw this coming :joy:

2 Likes
34

How many more people do you want to leave the game? More control doesnt make it better it just makes people quit.

35

Here’s my proposal:

Remove deserter’s duration and make it last indefinitely. Instead of preventing players from joining BGs, having it prevents players from joining fresh BGs; in other words, deserters can only fill in for other deserters in ongoing games. The debuff can stack up to 5 times (so serial leavers accumulate a “debt”) and the only way to clear a stack is by completing a game.

This way, people suffering from occasional disconnects, power outages, etc aren’t punished but AFKing out intentionally is.

I’ve proposed this in the past as a way to curb game leaving at 120 but it works equally well for the new wave of twink abuse.

36

Can you rephrase this to be more courteous to others?

37

Only if you do the same for all your non-courteous posts, Meliasane.

38

Sorry sir, I ate a 1 day suspension and you know, it would certainly break my heart if someone were to go through and ask them to review your…mean and hateful comments to others for implying they wear a :

Don’t you think its fair?

39

If you think I’m going to get suspended for saying someone wears a tinfoil hat, then I don’t know what to tell you friend.

It’s definitely not on the level of the vitriol that came from you previously, that’s for sure.

40

But tinfoil hat is a label for calling someone ignorant. Tsk, tsk. That’s not very play friendly implying people are ignorant. Be nice.