[Idea] New Class: Spellbreaker

Community General Discussion
1

Without to much detail:

Armor class: Mail
Stats:Agilty, Int
Roles:Tank, DPS
Weapons: One handed weapons (including warglaves. See wc3), shields, staffs

Specs: Spell Shield (tank, Intel)
Uses mana and a physical shield to mitigate damage and hold threat.

Soul Eater (dps, int)
Uses/absorbs targets resource pool to deal damage. Steals and reverses benefital buffs of all kinds. Focuses on arcane damage.

Weapons Master (DPS, agi)
Uses one hand weapons and a shield to pummel targets and disrupt the battlefield. Combines resource stealing and a unique resource (like rage, but does not decay) to deal physical and arcane damage.

/Endrightbrainthoughts

4 Likes
2

Weapons master by your description seems more str then agi to me.
Premise wise I think it could work.

Since I’m a dh I also have state two things:
Nooo my warglaives! and Remove one spec, not allowed to have more then 2!

3

Ye, but mail gear doesn’t have strength on it. :confused:

Gives more utility to warglaves :stuck_out_tongue:

4

This class sounds fun to test out. Is there any Spellbreakers in the game right now as NPCS?

1 Like
5

I’ll agree to this if I get a third spec that uses bow/guns just to take away hunter’s control!

I think they could easily tweak it to do so for a class, just then switches based on specs. Like it does for int to agi for mail classes or the others.

6

Valid question. I am unsure.

1 Like
7

(Statement): Unit Exacitor is reminded of a suggestion for a Battlemage class with specs for Spellblades, Spellbows, and Runemasters.

8

I like the idea of a spellbreaker class, i just don’t know what the right armor/spells should be for it.

9

I think death knights were meant to be spellbreakers. I’d rather see the tinker class especially with the discovery of mechagon.

10
11

Ye, and death knights have the feel of being anti-magic.

The main difference between the two would be manipulating target resources/tools against said target rather then nulling effects.

I see the popularity of it, but I am not a fan nor is my imagination :stuck_out_tongue:

13

Well, looks like I am not that unique.

Note: I do not play guild wars. :stuck_out_tongue:

14

Peee yeeeewww! :poop:

1 Like
15

I like the spell shield idea

hell I will play anything. GIMME GIMME!
(side note: please not an elf only class)

16

Aren’t the blood elf guards spellbreakers? I’m pretty sure they are but not 100% sure.

17

The suggested class would be really nice for mimicking night elf huntresses and blood elf spellbreakers from wc3. I want a nelf that can use moonglaives but I hate demon hunter.

Still though, I think we should be looking to add more specs and not more classes. This whole thing could be a fourth hunter spec tbh

1 Like
18

no this player base is dead set on tinkers and blizzard will give it to them.

19

I wouldn’t hold your breath. Blizzard hasn’t had a good reputation of giving the players ‘what they want’ in awhile. :wink:

1 Like
20

they wanted demon hunters they gave it to them.they wanted death knights they gave it to them.on new classes blizzard give them what they want to keep them subbed and playing.

i would expect to see tinkers after shadwolands.

21

Spell Breakers would actually work now that the Alliance has Void elves.

They would most likely make it so Belves and Velves teach other races too.